![]() |
2010-04-01
, 22:40
|
Posts: 37 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Bethesda, MD
|
#12
|
![]() |
2010-04-01
, 23:17
|
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#13
|
![]() |
2010-04-01
, 23:32
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#14
|
![]() |
2010-04-01
, 23:39
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#15
|
![]() |
2010-04-02
, 00:10
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ UK
|
#16
|
![]() |
2010-04-02
, 04:21
|
Posts: 37 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Bethesda, MD
|
#17
|
![]() |
2010-04-02
, 07:28
|
Posts: 133 |
Thanked: 50 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#19
|
Hmmm....
After posting this, I see that both products are 3M. On their site, the ARMR200 is referred to as "Protection film" while the DQC products is referred to as "Repair film". Based on this, the ARMR product looks like its the dogs danglies.
Jagger (any relation to the guy rolling the stones): Not sure about this MATTE product. I cant help feel that 3M know their onions better than most on this technology. Thanks for the input though.
![]() |
2010-04-02
, 11:37
|
Posts: 47 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#20
|
Not as robust as the Zagg, and not 100% scratch proof, but worth the price. I paid around 16 ukp from protectionfilms24 for 3 protectors and split the cost with two N900 colleagues.
A little tricky to get on. I still have some air on 2 extremities, only a couple of mm.
I'd love to compare the different films 1st hand, but for me think this was probably the best balance between clarity, feel & protection.