Active Topics
-
Firefox with Leste (10)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 14 hrs ago - more...
 |
danramos |
2010-07-31
, 05:27
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#11
|
Originally Posted by paulkoan
If they really are opening even just the drivers and possibly boot ROM info, I imagine this would both be possible and VERY VERY interesting to see. I wouldn't be able to do this sort of thing--but I can imagine many others in the community who probably can and would jump at it. I would LOVE to see that--might even prefer it over an open Android. Not sure. I would have to see the advantages either would have.
|
|
2010-07-31
, 05:27
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#12
|
Originally Posted by danramos
I personally like the front facing camera.
It's got TV-out via headphone jack, a six-axis accellerometer (!!!) and 5mp camera (no flash, though.. grr), small SMALL form factor.. I mean, really, with the exception of the lack of camera flash and keyboard, if they open-sourced its drivers and they're allowing the community to fix bugs and problems FOR them, it's easily an N900 killer.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss
They're maemo and MeeGo...
"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
|
|
2010-07-31
, 05:28
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#13
|
Originally Posted by Laughing Man
Me too. But I'd give it up in a heartbeat for a fully opened device, if Samsung is going that route.
I personally like the front facing camera.
|
|
2010-07-31
, 05:46
|
|
Posts: 422 |
Thanked: 244 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#14
|
Originally Posted by danramos
For sure. MeeGo on non-consortium hardware would be a huge win, a real step in the direction of freedom, and MeeGo becomes a proper hardware vendor independent linux distribution.
If they really are opening even just the drivers and possibly boot ROM info, I imagine this would both be possible and VERY VERY interesting to see. I wouldn't be able to do this sort of thing--but I can imagine many others in the community who probably can and would jump at it. I would LOVE to see that--might even prefer it over an open Android. Not sure. I would have to see the advantages either would have.
In my rosy and perhaps naive vision of the future it would only take a couple of big players to release their drivers to the kernel (and whatever else is required to the tree) before Meego momentum got underway and they all started doing it.
I fully expect to see this happen with in 10 years or so.
__________________
Servwise Advanced Hosting - Better, Faster, Smarter
Hum Consulting - IT and Marketing services to sing about
Servwise Advanced Hosting - Better, Faster, Smarter
Hum Consulting - IT and Marketing services to sing about
|
|
2010-07-31
, 05:57
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#15
|
Originally Posted by paulkoan
Samsung MeeGo says, "No, YOU GO" to Nokia's closed-mindedness!
For sure. MeeGo on non-consortium hardware would be a huge win, a real step in the direction of freedom, and MeeGo becomes a proper hardware vendor independent linux distribution.
In my rosy and perhaps naive vision of the future it would only take a couple of big players to release their drivers to the kernel (and whatever else is required to the tree) before Meego momentum got underway and they all started doing it.
I fully expect to see this happen with in 10 years or so.
What a glorious headline that could be.
I wonder if Samsung would agree?
Last edited by danramos; 2010-07-31 at 13:31. Reason: s/Nikon/Nokia/ wth was I thinking??
|
|
2010-07-31
, 05:57
|
|
Posts: 137 |
Thanked: 34 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ United States
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by danramos
my thoughts verbatim (thought i would use a word other than 'exactly')
"Wait and see, boys. Wait and see."
as for the hardware keyboard, every phone should have two versions, one with ('name of phone here' pro)and one without ('name of phone here')! HAHA JK! that was a joke everyone :P
|
|
2010-07-31
, 06:08
|
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#17
|
We'll see.
Dumping tarballs and .zip files on the community is at best base participation and can't compete with open repositories you can do a git clone of.
Skeptical, but downloading anyway.
Dumping tarballs and .zip files on the community is at best base participation and can't compete with open repositories you can do a git clone of.
Skeptical, but downloading anyway.
|
|
2010-07-31
, 06:19
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#18
|
Ok. I've been teetering on the edge of getting a Captivate since it's been offered to me by AT&T three times already... and I might just jump on it now.
This... is friggin' awesome news.
This... is friggin' awesome news.
| The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-07-31
, 06:22
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#19
|
Without trying to play down this, but isn't the wording a little like it's the parts they're obliged to open source like other vendors do?
That said, I'm giving them the benefit of a doubt and grabbing it too..
That said, I'm giving them the benefit of a doubt and grabbing it too..
__________________
As you go on to other communities, remember to build them around politeness, respect, trust and humility. Be wary of poisonous people and deal with them before they end up killing your community.. Seen it happen to too many IRC channels, forums, open source projects.
As you go on to other communities, remember to build them around politeness, respect, trust and humility. Be wary of poisonous people and deal with them before they end up killing your community.. Seen it happen to too many IRC channels, forums, open source projects.
| The Following User Says Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-07-31
, 06:27
|
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by Stskeeps
The only thing I can think of off the top of my head that they're obligated to open is the Linux kernel they distributed. I expect somewhat modified Android sources and no real hardware drivers.
Without trying to play down this, but isn't the wording a little like it's the parts they're obliged to open source like other vendors do?
That said, I'm giving them the benefit of a doubt and grabbing it too..
 |
| Tags |
| 2nokia, android, face palm, opensource |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17.