Creamy Goodness
|
2010-11-17
, 01:00
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#11
|
|
2010-11-17
, 01:01
|
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Finland
|
#12
|
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...37_video&num=1
The power kernel could definitely use this
If there is going to be a PR1.4 this should be in it.
|
2010-11-17
, 01:30
|
Posts: 842 |
Thanked: 1,197 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#13
|
|
2010-11-17
, 01:59
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#14
|
If it does -anything- about IO-wait(and or compression tasks), I'll be happy. Right now, if you have apt doing it's thing, things near lock up.
The idea here is that multitasking will work a bit better, and it might.
Either way, it can't hurt to try.
The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-17
, 02:45
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#15
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Creamy Goodness For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-17
, 11:44
|
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Finland
|
#16
|
If it does -anything- about IO-wait(and or compression tasks), I'll be happy. Right now, if you have apt doing it's thing, things near lock up.
|
2010-11-17
, 12:33
|
|
Posts: 850 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#17
|
|
2010-11-17
, 18:31
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#19
|
To be honest, the proper(TM) fix for that would be for apt to run at nice level of 15. 15 means the lowest possible priority, and 0 is the default priority for applications, thus all other tasks would have priority over apt and it shouldn't bring the system to its knees. You don't need a different scheduler for that.
Of course, it was a hindsight on Nokia's part not to make apt run at nice lvl 15 all the time. One way to get around that would be to simply rename the apt binary to something else and replace it with a script that calls the actual binary but with a proper nice level.
root nice -n 15 apt-get update && nice -n 15 apt-get upgrade
|
2010-11-17
, 19:04
|
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Finland
|
#20
|
And monitored processes through htop and all of them which are related to apt-get got nice value of 0. What went wrong?
Tags |
kernel patch, linux |
Thread Tools | |
|