The Following User Says Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-01-08
, 11:36
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#12
|
![]() |
2011-01-08
, 15:13
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#13
|
![]() |
2011-01-08
, 15:29
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#14
|
Looks like the Qualcomm GPU is older gen than the Cortex one too: http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=56866&page=2
The Following User Says Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-01-08
, 18:17
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#15
|
The Texas Instrument (Droid X) chips are supposed to be equal.
The original (Nexus One) and second-model (HTC EVO 4G) Snapdragons @1GHz are noticably slower than a standard Cortex A8 @1GHz.
The second generation Snapdragon (HTC Desire HD) @1GHz is supposed to faster than the previous model, but I sense it is only on par with the Texas Instrument @1GHz.
Ofcourse, anything with Cortex A9 demolishes these ... but the "slight" power difference between the GalaxyS to the Nexus One is not apparent if the drivers/coding is sloppy *ahem Samsung *ahem.