|
2013-01-05
, 22:58
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 119 times |
Joined on Dec 2012
|
#12
|
|
2013-01-05
, 23:04
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#13
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-01-05
, 23:05
|
Posts: 371 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#14
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Acidspunk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-01-05
, 23:34
|
Posts: 951 |
Thanked: 2,344 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ UK
|
#15
|
My old n8 multitasks much better and more reliable than my one x
n8 has 680 MHz single core and 256mb ram
One X has 1.5 GHz dual core and 1gb ram
This doesn't make sense
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mariusmssj For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-01-05
, 23:37
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 119 times |
Joined on Dec 2012
|
#16
|
Well, I've been using an Xperia Mini Pro for about a month now and to be quite honest, it's getting harder for me to go back to my n900 each time. I keep it charged and still use it, but it just feels slow and clunky in comparison. Even the default browser on the mini pro was pretty impressive as it's a competitor to microB and I wasn't expecting it to be. Long story short, I didn't expect to like android as much, and I'm generally impressed with it. If only it had CuteTube
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to waldo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-01-05
, 23:56
|
Posts: 1,269 |
Thanked: 3,961 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Brazil
|
#17
|
This is not actually true. Android has supported activity based multi-tasking since API level 1, or the version before the first commercially released version of the OS. Some apps run completely as services (eg. VX Connectbox SSH) and only shut down on an explicit exit, which is analogous to the way it's handled on the linux desktop (for example).
http://developer.android.com/referen.../Activity.html
It is certainly more complex than process exclusive multi-tasking, but it also has the advantage of allowing the OS to determine how best to manage limited resources, and gives the app control based on a number of states. This is a big deal on mobile devices with limited memory and battery capacity. I also suspect would be very valuable addition on the desktop as well. It even simplifies user-management, as it is generally not required to actually exit out of apps. (I say 'generally' because some stubborn apps stay in memory and do not allow the OS to clean them up.)
And I agree that some apps do not cache well, or otherwise re-start when selected from the task manager. Of course, this is avoidable through better code, and the developer should be contacted.
|
2013-01-06
, 00:06
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 161 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ San Francisco, CA
|
#18
|
|
2013-01-06
, 00:35
|
Posts: 1,539 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ With my N9
|
#20
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Arie For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
bloatedswisbad! |
Thread Tools | |
|
Android might have been supporting multitasking since day 1, but to this day it feels as if that feature is meant for "very special" apps only, and the developers have to jump through hoops to achieve it.
I rarely use an Android device, but I too am constant wondering which app still is runing and which one have been killed. And usually it's the other way around than what I'd expected, with the browser redownloading pages AGAIN etc.
They've dumbed it down too much.