![]() |
2015-06-03
, 17:04
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#12
|
you could just ask the moderator of the subsection to be more transparent...
![]() |
2015-06-03
, 17:08
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#13
|
![]() |
2015-06-03
, 18:30
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#14
|
![]() |
2015-06-03
, 23:57
|
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 1,097 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ Netherlands
|
#15
|
Ok, couple of examples, so it is easier to discuss (didn't think this was such a new/little known idea):
https://8ch.net/log.php?board=n
https://modlog.github.io/#/r/conspiracy
The amount of detail is up for discussion, sure you will not repost child porn to logs, call the police, report IP etc, still a note should be left in logs. Mask IPs by randomly generated ids, or just use account names, mods can be masked to (mod1/mod2...) so people can see when modx goes on a rampage and can complain, admin will know who that is. Plenty of options to consider and not relying on mod remembering to add a note (which is not possible for deleted posts/threads btw)
(and the idea of reposting non-illegal content that was removed to a place like irclogs is good, keeps the thread going (how many OT rants gone missing?), stops link farming as not main site/not a clickable link with markup etc, illegal, sure delete, just leave trace of action taken
The Following User Says Thank You to Wasmachinemann-NL For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-06-04
, 00:10
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#16
|
![]() |
2015-06-04
, 00:43
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 1,648 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Hamburg
|
#17
|
Last edited by szopin; Today at 02:30. Reason: missing bracket and picture of hotwheels, the most hated admin in the world for allowing free speech, and a bit of typo/rewording, no mods involved for all i know
The Following User Says Thank You to Win7Mac For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-06-04
, 00:47
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#18
|
![]() |
2015-06-04
, 00:58
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 1,648 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Hamburg
|
#19
|
please tell me how the only bastion of openness and free speech remains unknown to the visitors of this forum?
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Win7Mac For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-06-04
, 01:00
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#20
|
![]() |
Tags |
where is https |
Thread Tools | |
|
However, the #1 priority should be HTTPS - I was shocked that it wasn't supported when I joined the forum about a year ago. Not supporting https is way more of a privacy issue than the chance of moderators being malicious - didn't the hack on ubuntuforums start with stolen moderator credentials? If moderator actions are performed over HTTP, then this a foreseeable risk.
A cert costs all of about £5/yr...