Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (8)
to Nokia N900 by whayong - 1 hr, 12 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 4 days, 21 hrs ago - more...
mve |
2010-06-01
, 17:18
|
|
Posts: 103 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Jyväskylä, Finland
|
#191
|
Originally Posted by zimon
I'm on same boat here, no need to add qt in the application name. Maybe just name it to eCoach 2.0 and Other profile would be nice to have.
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mve For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-06-03
, 09:05
|
|
Posts: 130 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#192
|
I'm just beginning to use eCoach. Am I correct in assuming that height and weight must be entered in metric even if the diplay unit is set to imperial (that it isn't somehow a glitch that it asks me to enter metric info even though it offers to set the display units in imperial)?
Last edited by davetech; 2010-06-03 at 18:38.
Last edited by davetech; 2010-06-03 at 18:38.
|
|
2010-06-03
, 09:26
|
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#193
|
Originally Posted by zimon
Yeah, that would be nice. I guess many people use it also to record routes with non-sports activities such as driving a car or a motorcycle.
Train, aeroplane, helicopter, wind surfing, boat, ...
Maybe at least "Other". Now I am using "running" for all misc. stuff.
Originally Posted by zimon
Agreed.
IMO it is useless to mention Qt in every program's name where Qt is used. It should be irrelevant for the user what libraries has been used.
 |
|
2010-06-04
, 08:26
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#194
|
Originally Posted by mve
Okay. Agreed. If renaming is not needed keep eCoach.
I'm on same boat here, no need to add qt in the application name. Maybe just name it to eCoach 2.0 and Other profile would be nice to have.
|
|
2010-06-04
, 13:42
|
|
Posts: 130 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#195
|
Originally Posted by davetech
Anyone? It's a quick question, right?
I'm just beginning to use eCoach. Am I correct in assuming that height and weight must be entered in metric even if the diplay unit is set to imperial (that it isn't somehow a glitch that it asks me to enter metric info even though it offers to set the display units in imperial)?
 |
|
2010-06-04
, 16:23
|
|
Posts: 166 |
Thanked: 191 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Oulu, Finland
|
#196
|
Originally Posted by davetech
Yeah currently you can enter that info only in metric values.
I'm just beginning to use eCoach. Am I correct in assuming that height and weight must be entered in metric even if the diplay unit is set to imperial (that it isn't somehow a glitch that it asks me to enter metric info even though it offers to set the display units in imperial)?
|
|
2010-06-08
, 19:05
|
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#197
|
Hi!
When you connect the Zephyr pulseband and go for a run, is it possible for e-coach to make a signal when you for example exceeds a specified value on the pulse? If it isn´t, is it possible in a future update? That feature would be very appriciated by those who make pulseexercise.
When you connect the Zephyr pulseband and go for a run, is it possible for e-coach to make a signal when you for example exceeds a specified value on the pulse? If it isn´t, is it possible in a future update? That feature would be very appriciated by those who make pulseexercise.
| The Following User Says Thank You to glx For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-06-10
, 08:47
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on May 2008
|
#198
|
Having now become quite additcted to eCoach while cycling I thought I'd drop a HUGE thanks for the app - been something I'd always wanted but never had to cash to buy a dedicated cycling GPS system. And I also thought I'd share this site with you (no Idea if this has been mentined before in this thread) http://utrack.crempa.net/ - here you can load up your .gpx from eCoach and produce a .pdf of your training data, speed, elevation, distance, maps etc.. very good fun!
Now if only I could work out how to correct for the elevation offset in the GPS data....
Now if only I could work out how to correct for the elevation offset in the GPS data....
|
|
2010-06-10
, 08:55
|
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#199
|
Originally Posted by sampppa
eCoach is the main name of the program and right now you have situation weher you two entities of same app. Just with different framework.
Btw. What would be good name for the Qt eCoach? qCoach eCoachQt, CuteCoach, QtCoach or what?
So do you want that these programs show one after another in different lists? Then you should start name eCoach and add something to end like:
eCoach_Qt, eCoach-Qt,eCoach(Qt)
In the end it´s just something that you probably have to do but I think that having two version of app just confuses end user. Qt doesn't tell anything to most living begins and just scrambles name in traditional FOSS way
| The Following User Says Thank You to slender For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-06-10
, 09:50
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#200
|
The question is, will Qt eCoach be the successor of the old eCoach or is your plan to continue booth versions?
If it is the successor, then renaming is not necessary. It's simply only version 2.0 of eCoach. And eCoach 1.x is not continued in development.
If it is the successor, then renaming is not necessary. It's simply only version 2.0 of eCoach. And eCoach 1.x is not continued in development.
