Originally Posted by Bratag

Several people have already stated that with the new firmware that with wifi always on and some moderate to heavy use the battery gets between 12-13 hours. Thats pretty damn good in my opinion.

Originally Posted by Mandor

... and thus it came to past that the Nokia N900 was released and people were wondering what he meant by "unstable" and "Nokia won't be able to make it work in time". That is why, my children, we are gathering here around this review as a memorial of his monumental failure. Let us remember tonight, so the future generations can never forget.

My 2 cents.

I read reviews for : 1) Photos and 2) Features.
Opinions are mine and mine only, after I tested it. (October 31st, Chicago)

I have been looking to own (not owned by a carrier or another company) a mobile phone since last year.

The device, even though the hardware is marked as proto (and called Nxx rather than N900) and the firmware is quite an early one, is ROCK STABLE. This is actually one of the things that amaze me THE MOST. I got the device on Sept 3rd or so, been playing with it DAILY for almost three weeks now, and it didn't crash A SINGLE TIME!

Originally Posted by mykenyc

What i don't understand is every phone is not super duper. Okay, it have crashes so what? Now unless it happens every 4 hours or less then thats a problem and even so my Mytouch 3g force closes like a mofo sometimes but people still hack and use it to make it better. Thats the point of community like this to provide a way for other people to solve out problems. My N95 crashed but i still loved it nonetheless. His review is just a review he's one man and have opinions i didn't read the article and probably won't but at the end of the day you can return you phone if you don't like it. Why is everyone getting so crazy over nothing. Like i said earlier I'm getting this device no matter what because its like the N95 i miss on steroids with a better browser consider me sold!

Originally Posted by kopte3

You know, he didn't existed before you heard of him. I think whether you heard of him or not is so irrelevant. He's well known reviewer. He didn't become famous because of his pre-released review.
Of course it's sudden because he reports about device for 2011. and he wants to describe it in a few words. Blowing out N900 out of the water says very much about how good something is, right? How many people do you know on the internet that have that kind of connections and that kind of insight in future of mobile phones?
No pics, of course, he wouldn't show us N920 pics because he doesn't want to harm companies that much. If you're going to say "and what about N900!?" - he did a preview week before it's official announcement and said he thinks he cannot harm it that way. He had a N900 from May, so he could do it much much earlier if he wanted to do as much damage as he can. About device for 2011. - other blogs don't know that stuff.

Originally Posted by Jaffa

It's only worth a corporation going after an individual if that individual has sufficient wealth and assets to make the recompense worthwhile. Otherwise you spend a lot of money to make a point. That may, or may not, be best for shareholder value in the medium to long term.

Originally Posted by Laughing Man

True, but if somebody's writing is damaging the brand-name of your smartphone/smart-computer-phone then it might just be worth it to make a point.