|
2011-07-08
, 19:26
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#202
|
WP + Nokia = cool ecosystem, cool devices, cool OS for high end, future proof.
Harmattan = question mark, but will provide synergy with Symbian.
My point is this: WP is high end and it will take several years before WP is pushed down to mid end (as stated by Elop).
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:33
|
Posts: 751 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ East Gowanus
|
#203
|
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:41
|
Posts: 1,033 |
Thanked: 1,013 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#204
|
I have an WP7 phone. The OS, the ecosystem, the way it integrates into my active lifestyle... it's not high end. In fact, it's a feature phone at best.
And I'm being kind by saying that. Let's be realistic for a moment... saying it is high end, selling it at high end, and ultimately selling it at all have been three things that have yet to happen convincingly in regards to WP7.
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:44
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#205
|
[...]
What we have is:
WP + Nokia = cool ecosystem, cool devices, cool OS for high end, future proof.
[...]
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:46
|
Posts: 1,033 |
Thanked: 1,013 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#206
|
future proof according to whom?
Steve Jobs?
Eric Schmidt?
do you really expect Apple & Google to role belly up & let m$ (& NOKIA, but NOKIA is really only a bystander then) take over the market?
right now, even RIM fares better then m$
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:47
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#207
|
Dude, get with the times, if the OS is running on a 1GHz CPU it must be high end.
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:51
|
Posts: 523 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#208
|
MeeGo must go down the drain. Symbian will never be developed fast enough for high end devices to compete with twin core 1.5 GHz android slabs, WP will. Therefore a change of direction is needed, and has been effectuated.
What we have is:
WP + Nokia = cool ecosystem, cool devices, cool OS for high end, future proof.
Symbian + Nokia = cool OS subcontracted to accenture, cool devices. Uncertain future, but as long as there is demand and WP isn't pushed down to lower end...
Harmattan = question mark, but will provide synergy with Symbian.
S40 = Future proof, cheap devices, web apps, next billion and so on.
My point is this: WP is high end and it will take several years before WP is pushed down to mid end (as stated by Elop). Therefore, nothing is better for Nokia right now, than Symbian doing well. I'm happy, my E6 is happy.
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:52
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#209
|
I suggest you stop replying to Ericsson, he is definitely a Microsoft bot.
![]() |
2011-07-08
, 19:52
|
Posts: 1,033 |
Thanked: 1,013 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#210
|
naaaa,
if you had to pay hundreds of bucks to get it, it IS high-end, even on a 166Mhz pentium
the problem w/ m$ software is that no matter how powerful the CPU is, it is always too slow :|
The Following User Says Thank You to patlak For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
balmer was here, e6 rox, elop rox, elop snopp, elop's fool, the elop flop |
Thread Tools | |
|