Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
Poll Options
Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 169 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Portugal
#2101
Hi all.
I've a question\sugestion, to improve that 125-XXX'X' Kernels.
So, what about we can have a, for exemple, (125)250-900 Mhz ?

The 125 Mhz only will be used when the screen is off, phone iddle, screen locket! When it gets up..it goes to 250 Mhz!

Is this possible?
This will make that 125-XXX'x' kernels a bit of perfection!

Regards
 
debernardis's Avatar
Posts: 2,142 | Thanked: 2,054 times | Joined on Dec 2006 @ Sicily
#2102
Originally Posted by Jokah View Post
Then I started check dmesg regularly and I run into this bug:
WARNING: at /home/builder2/maemo-fremantle-armel-extras-devel/work/kernel-maemo-2.6.28/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c:443 omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate+0x28c/0x2dc()
In my hands it shows with Lehto's kernel at 800 and 1000 MHz (1000-800-250-ulv) and 1100 MHz (1100-800-250-ulv) but not 900/500/125 MHz (non-ulv), and with Titan's kernel (ulv) at 800 and 850 MHz but not at 810 MHz.

So my guess is that the kernel likes MHz values divisible by 3 (i.e. 810 and 900) and warns for speeds which aren't a mutiple of 3.
__________________
Ernesto de Bernardis


Last edited by debernardis; 2010-04-10 at 14:12.
 
Posts: 53 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Switzerland
#2103
Originally Posted by debernardis View Post
In my hands it shows with Lehto's kernel at 800 and 1000 MHz but not 900 MHz, and with Titan's kernel at 800 and 850 MHz but not at 810 MHz.

So my guess is that the kernel likes MHz values divisible by 3 (i.e. 810 and 900) and warns for speeds which aren't a mutiple of 3.
The 810 result you got it with the default -maemo20 kernel or with the LV or ULV version? please specify always with which kernel (standard, lv, ulv) you get the results.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Jokah For This Useful Post:
Posts: 118 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Mississauga, ON Canada
#2104
Am I the only one here not able to boot using Lehto's ULV kernel's? Cannot boot using either one. All other standard kernels are working, just not the ULV's.

Any tips to get these going?
 
Posts: 255 | Thanked: 109 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#2105
Originally Posted by instigator View Post
Am I the only one here not able to boot using Lehto's ULV kernel's? Cannot boot using either one. All other standard kernels are working, just not the ULV's.

Any tips to get these going?
try reading page 187.
it may or may not help.
 
Posts: 946 | Thanked: 1,650 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#2106
Just ignore the warning. I occurs whenever the kernel changes to 800Mhz, both with Letho's and my older kernels. My latest kernels (not the one in extras*) use 810 instead of 800 and the warning does not longer show up.

The reset of 125->250 by the phone is still an issue and I'll try another workaround soon.
for now, you manually have to set it back for 124999 after every phone call.
 
jaeezzy's Avatar
Posts: 664 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Australia
#2107
sorry for this out of nowhere one but what DSP does ulv kernel-maemo20 of yours using, titan? 810 is so far stable for me and 850 lil like a heater for my device, however I came across this issue while in 810 but not sure whose fault it was enna was opened and I was browsing TMO at the same time and there was no way text fields/areas in the browser grabbing focus unless I closed enna. I guess its enna.
 
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#2108
Originally Posted by titan View Post
Just ignore the warning. I occurs whenever the kernel changes to 800Mhz, both with Letho's and my older kernels. My latest kernels (not the one in extras*) use 810 instead of 800 and the warning does not longer show up.

The reset of 125->250 by the phone is still an issue and I'll try another workaround soon.
for now, you manually have to set it back for 124999 after every phone call.
I've had my first crash with your ULV kernel at 810MHz. I had run both your and Letho's earlier kernels at 900MHz without stability problems but apparently my unit didn't like the lower voltage at 810MHz.

Anyway, I switched back to 750MHz through pmconfig and it seems to be working problem-free for now...
 
Posts: 1,729 | Thanked: 388 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#2109
Originally Posted by Dirkjl View Post
Anyone have an idea why flasher is saying this to me when i want to flash the kernel:

Suitable USB Device not found, waiting

help

im using this command:

flasher-3.5.exe -k zImage-900mhz -f -R
that happens to me when i use windows vista and win7
 
Ronaldo's Avatar
Posts: 682 | Thanked: 208 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ UK
#2110
the command is

flasher-3.5 -k zImage-900mhz -f -R

NOT

flasher-3.5.exe -k zImage-900mhz -f -R
__________________
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
 
Reply

Tags
cooking on gas, cortex-a8, faster, first to fry it wins!, hardware, its smoking, n900, need for speed, need for weed, nos, omap, omap3, omap3430, overclock, overclocking, soc, system-on-a-chip, the dogs, this thread got good!, vtec just kicked in y0!, warranty will be void, whooplah, zoom zoom

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:30.