Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 19 hrs, 50 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 6 days, 8 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kabouik For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2017-07-24
, 13:12
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2272
|
Updated https://openrepos.net/content/coderus/patchmanager-20 to match builtin Unapply all patches patch to 2.1.1 release
Also added 2.1.1.23 to patchmanager online catalog options, enjoy!
Also added 2.1.1.23 to patchmanager online catalog options, enjoy!
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2017-07-24
, 18:29
|
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 1,246 times |
Joined on Aug 2015
|
#2273
|
Originally Posted by coderus
Well, this is *not* the case (100% reproducible = always fails after unapplying the first 10 Patches) on my two Jolla 1 phones under SFOS 2.1.0.11 (as described in in issue #12; tested more than four times on each phone, more than ten times cumulatively, over the course of the last couple of weeks).
"Unapply all patches" works fine on 2.1.0.x
[...]
If there is anything, I should check or record and post to you, please let me know.
Last edited by olf; 2017-07-24 at 18:54.
|
|
2017-07-24
, 21:50
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2274
|
Originally Posted by olf
i mean unapply all patches patch
Well, this is *not* the case (100% reproducible = always fails after unapplying the first 10 Patches) on my two Jolla 1 phones under SFOS 2.1.0.11 (as described in in issue #12; tested more than four times on each phone, more than ten times cumulatively, over the course of the last couple of weeks).
If there is anything, I should check or record and post to you, please let me know.
|
|
2017-07-24
, 23:56
|
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 1,246 times |
Joined on Aug 2015
|
#2275
|
Originally Posted by coderus
Well, that was too terse for me to comprehend:
i mean unapply all patches patch
Did you mean: You are sure, that the "Unapply all patches" built-in Patch of Patchmanager 2.0 works fine when updating SailfishOS, while triggering "Unapply all patches" via Patchmanager 2.0's top pulley entry seems to be broken?
|
|
2017-07-25
, 06:22
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2276
|
Originally Posted by olf
correct. unapply all patches patch is working totally different way than similar menu entry in patchmanager ui.
Well, that was too terse for me to comprehend:
Did you mean: You are sure, that the "Unapply all patches" built-in Patch of Patchmanager 2.0 works fine when updating SailfishOS, while triggering "Unapply all patches" via Patchmanager 2.0's top pulley entry seems to be broken?
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2017-07-25
, 21:15
|
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 1,246 times |
Joined on Aug 2015
|
#2277
|
patchmanager-2.3.2-10.40.1.jolla_.armv7hl.rpm installs flawlessly under SFOS 2.1.0.11, but subsequently applying its built-in Patch "Remove all patches" fails (presumably as it is made for SFOS 2.1.1.23).
Supposedly Patchmanager 2.3.2-10.40.1 ought to fail to install on SFOS 2.1.0.x per RPM conflict.
Tested on Jolla 1 phones (under SFOS 2.1.0.11, obviously
), using Warehouse for updating.
Reverted to Patchmanager 2.3.1-10.39.1, now built-in Patch "Remove all patches" applies flawlessly, again.
Supposedly Patchmanager 2.3.2-10.40.1 ought to fail to install on SFOS 2.1.0.x per RPM conflict.
Tested on Jolla 1 phones (under SFOS 2.1.0.11, obviously
), using Warehouse for updating. Reverted to Patchmanager 2.3.1-10.39.1, now built-in Patch "Remove all patches" applies flawlessly, again.
|
|
2017-07-25
, 21:42
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2278
|
Originally Posted by olf
I told you right here. Patch can't be made universal due to changes in 2.1.1, so latest patchmanager is only compatible with latest sfos version.
patchmanager-2.3.2-10.40.1.jolla_.armv7hl.rpm installs flawlessly under SFOS 2.1.0.11, but subsequently applying its built-in Patch "Remove all patches" fails (presumably as it is made for SFOS 2.1.1.23).
Supposedly Patchmanager 2.3.2-10.40.1 ought to fail to install on SFOS 2.1.0.x per RPM conflict.
Tested on Jolla 1 phones (under SFOS 2.1.0.11, obviously
Reverted to Patchmanager 2.3.1-10.39.1, now built-in Patch "Remove all patches" applies flawlessly, again.
|
|
2017-07-25
, 22:32
|
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 1,246 times |
Joined on Aug 2015
|
#2279
|
Originally Posted by coderus
That was not my point (and clear before, as you denoted); it was to point out the seemingly missing RPM conflict (with SFOS < 2.1.1) to you (as the main developer of Patchmanager 2.0) and users running into the same issue.
[...] Patch can't be made universal due to changes in 2.1.1, so latest patchmanager is only compatible with latest sfos version.
But hey, one can easily revert to the previous version (although this is a bit tedious) and ignore this update in Warehouse / Storeman, until SFOS 2.1.1 is publicly released. (I.e. everything is fine, basically.
)
|
|
2017-07-25
, 22:48
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#2280
|
pushing an update most can't install is a much worse solution 
 |
| Tags |
| patchmanager, sailfish os |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:31.
Also, is "Improved notification preview" an update to "Notification dismiss & remove" and is the latter an update to "Notification dismiss"? I'm a bit confused with all those patches having different names, if they are all the same more or less advance patch, giving them different names means they can be installed in parallel and be visible in the list in Patchmanager, that's confusing.