Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 97 | Thanked: 67 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Santiago, Chile
#221
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
For this particular phone, the only review issue I care about is the battery.

Software issues can be fixed at some point, if apps crash I can write my own to replace. The hardware specs are adequate enough to last at least 2 years with the current software advancements.

However the battery is the real deal breaker. This is something that cannot be changed and software optimization can only go so far.

With 3G and no wifi can the phone last from 9am to 12am with 15-20% battery left with
- instant email
- facebook status every A mins (will it share the email internet connection?)
- B hours music
- C mins surfing
- D mins video

What are A,B,C,D or perhaps put it another way, is the battery usage at least HALF as good as the E71/E72?

I would not be surprised if the first reviewer to give negative battery results will be flamed and tarred alive!
first off hello to this forum

re battery life. I agree this will be important to most. As a heavy user of the N95 (joikuspot) I am used to batteries getting drained pretty quickly but thank god we can change it and carry multiple ones. Re the review. I don't really care about this one and am waiting for the phone to be released and see the overall reaction of the testers (not the techcrunch guys or OM Malik obviously)
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#222
I'd like to remark that on one of the screenshots he shows he's installed two of my apps from extras-devel.

Well, the issue is that neither did fully work by the time he probably did the review - I've since gotten some useful feedback and at least one of them should work a bit better now.
Of course, that's the reason they were in extras-devel in the first place and not -testing, but I can imagine that deciding to install a few apps and seeing them not doing what they were supposed to do would only bias him in a negative way.

Hopefully he understood what extras-devel means and the fact I do not have a N900 and thus have to do "blind testing".

Last edited by javispedro; 2009-09-25 at 11:20.
 

The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post:
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#223
Originally Posted by ArnimS View Post
And copyright infringement is neither of those.
Psst, maybe this ***** was referring to N900 prototype...

Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
...and as a former N800 QA engineer I can assure you they happen. We encountered the occasional hardware glitch on some units that didn't show up on the vast majority, and all in preproduction and early release. But then, that only serves to underscore the points about eldar's "preview" being disingenuous; his reported troubles induce a concern disproportionate to the reality.
..and we know Nokia had to sacrifice for priorities because of bugs found. Like with USB.

Also, do not neglect possibility the user (Eldar in this case) operated the device wrong.

Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
You mean Nokia's reputation for treating its smartphone buyers as beta-testers? The N-Series devices certainly don't have a reputation as being rock-solid on initial releases.
I'm not aware of that reputation but I am aware that when a product is released to masses it is entirely possible these people are going to use the device in ways internal testing did not.

Originally Posted by Mandor View Post
That is why I insist on always testing it myself before I spend the money. Reviews will only tell me if it worth my time to go and test the device.
You cannot fully test a piece of electronics in a store in such a limited amount of time, and some hardware like a HDD you cannot extensively test as customer.

If I'll want to test Nokia N900 I will have to travel 2x 1,5-2 hours for that. I rather buy Nokia N900, and if I do not like it use my EU rights to send it back.

Likewise, I bought an iPod touch partly to review iPhoneOS. Yes, I needed a new flash-based DAP too. I combined these 2 'needs' (luxaries, rather).

Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Even though I've followed this thread, I might have missed if there are any reviews from 3rd parties other than this individual out there on more recent firmware.

Thanks in advance.
As posted earlier in this thread:

Michal Jerz from My-Symbian.com has used a prototype since 20090903 and has not experienced a single crash.

Perhaps Eldar upgraded to newer firmware which introduced regressions. We'll never know.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!

Last edited by allnameswereout; 2009-09-25 at 13:53.
 
Posts: 130 | Thanked: 46 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ New York
#224
Originally Posted by zerojay View Post
If you don't understand why we're complaining, read the previous posts. It should be plenty clear to you.
its really not the fact of getting at the complainers i understand why but what I'm saying is we giving to much into this topic people will do what they want to nonetheless. I understand that people look at his reviews for guidance but there will be even more million reviews, hands on, and buyers when the device drops .
[edit]..
just read what qgil said and agree 100%, basically the same thing I'm saying.

Brothers, sisters: love, peace and prosperity.

If you notice it, everybody is trying to do their job as good as they can. The Maemo team is working on a great product. Eldar makes reviews based on what he has and no matter what his intentions are it's clear that he puts his best skills into it. All you are great smart dudes that could be just wathing TV and instead you are here squeezing your brain and skills as well.

It's not worth discussing about appreciations that will be obsoleted as soon as the N900 starts selling, no matter how positive or negative such appreciations are. Pre-order, wait, support, critize... Do as you want, what matters is this common interest of making something great with this Maemo 5.

Respect is more important than any bug or any piece of silicon, and ultimately we are all here for the fun of it.

Last edited by mykenyc; 2009-09-25 at 13:53.
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#225
Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
I'd like to remark that on one of the screenshots he shows he's installed two of my apps...
Well, at least we know he's a man of taste and culture.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Posts: 341 | Thanked: 607 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#226
Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
I'd like to remark that on one of the screenshots he shows he's installed two of my apps from extras-devel.

Well, the issue is that neither did fully work by the time he probably did the review - I've since gotten some useful feedback and at least one of them should work a bit better now.
Of course, that's the reason they were in extras-devel in the first place and not -testing, but I can imagine that deciding to install a few apps and seeing them not doing what they were supposed to do would only bias him in a negative way.

Hopefully he understood what extras-devel means and the fact I do not have a N900 and thus have to do "blind testing".
Yes, I was about to point that out too. It looks like he crammed the device with unstable software, who knows what consequences that has on the device's overall stability (let alone battery life). Hopefully that's just for screenshots and not what he is basing his comments on.
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#227
Originally Posted by kanishou View Post
Yes, I was about to point that out too. It looks like he crammed the device with unstable software, who knows what consequences that has on the device's overall stability (let alone battery life). .
I wouldn't go that far -- few apps will affect overall stability.
But otherwise, your point is valid. If he lets any of the apps in extras-devel unfavor his opinion about the device in any way I'd consider the review invalid -- because of people like me (who use extras-devel for what I think it is: a testground for experimental apps, which may or may not have enough quality yet to be promoted to -testing).
Of course, this does not apply for apps in extras(-stable).

However, don't forget to give him the benefit of doubt. Probably, he did know what to expect from extras-devel.

Last edited by javispedro; 2009-09-25 at 16:20. Reason: claryifing
 

The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post:
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#228
Haha that would be the equivilent of jailbreaking the iPhone, installing a bunch of unstable apps and then saying the iPhone sucks because of that.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post:
kopte3's Avatar
Posts: 270 | Thanked: 303 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Serbia, Belgrade
#229
No it wouldn't.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kopte3 For This Useful Post:
jandmdickerson's Avatar
Posts: 294 | Thanked: 174 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#230
Originally Posted by kopte3 View Post
No it wouldn't.
Thou dost protest too much, methinks....

Do you have anything to gain here? Is this about gaining traffic on a certain website?

hmmm.....
 
Reply

Tags
eldar, nokia n900 preview

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46.