The Following User Says Thank You to fpp For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-08-09
, 11:51
|
|
Administrator |
Posts: 1,036 |
Thanked: 2,019 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Germany
|
#222
|
Yes, it could cause an automatic reboot if you are miser running it. If you run it only when you feel the system is slow you are ok then.
The answer is pretty clear here, NO, just try it and you will see. I challenge you to make a video showing the battery percent before and after running the script, and then same video but rebooting and that way we all can see if you theory about the MHZ at full load taking eating the battery is true. I already know it is not, like most of the people that use this script.
but extending it with additional "killall processes" stuff
There will always be n00bs reading. How can you prevent it? can you control the internet? Just saying.. Still, GOD bless YOU
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 13:42
|
Posts: 38 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#223
|
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 13:57
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ canada
|
#224
|
That is the right way to use the script, only use it when you need it
. I mean, don't be miser, the N900 WILL NOT become more speedy just for running this script 100 times in a row. Your N900 is pretty good already!
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 14:01
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ canada
|
#225
|
Hi JorgeFX,
Sorry to not be clear. I was asking about this new script you're working on. What exactly is it supposed to do and how are you progressing on it? Is the point to modify the N900 setting in such a way as to avoid persistent slow-down problems or does it have another goal?
Thanks for the optimize script btw. I don't find I have to run it much but I appreciate the effort you made in providing it nonetheless.
thanks
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 15:01
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ under the sky
|
#226
|
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 16:06
|
Posts: 84 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Leeds, UK
|
#227
|
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 19:05
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Texas, USA
|
#228
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mooninite For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 19:26
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ canada
|
#229
|
While the intentions of the author may be good, this script is of little value.
![]() |
2010-08-12
, 21:17
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Texas, USA
|
#230
|
I beg to differ. Since I started using this script (optimizing or not) I haven't needed to reboot. It is of value to me as I haven't had to discover that my phone needs rebooting by being unable to answer a call. As used to happen every couple days.
There seems to be a lot of fear-mongering about this script. Is there any actual evidence to back up the claims that it causes all sorts of damage? Or is it all just FUD?
$ cat OptimizeN900
![]() |
Tags |
faster, reflash, refresh, script-a-brick, sell it |
Thread Tools | |
|
maemo blog