Reply
Thread Tools
Ovek's Avatar
Posts: 106 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#2381
Originally Posted by stemfour View Post
Erm... So Nokia are basing their future market share on a niche product eh?
Maemo 6 and whatever phone or "mobile computer" they release with it is the future of Nokia high end phone segment.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Ovek For This Useful Post:
Posts: 135 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#2382
Originally Posted by bret hart View Post
You are totally wrong here. This is a niche product and the vast majority of the population has little knowledge of the high end smartphone market. Having said that if some retailers are getting their stock later than others this can only mean that demand is outstripping supply.
Actually your wrong, There is a reason Nokia is moving from Symbian to Maemo, the N900 is the flagship phone, the phone to bring them back into the market, the phone to release a old but redesigned OS to the market, Symbian is not very loved around here. I don't know anyone that uses Symbian anymore, maybe where you live people have little knowledge of high end smart phones but here in Texas a lot of people pay for expensive phones, whatever there reason is to buy them, they do pay the money.
 
switch2ux's Avatar
Posts: 142 | Thanked: 12 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Austria
#2383
Originally Posted by sharper View Post
You're wasting your time. I was reading through this bug report the other day and spotted a familiar name

https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5337

Remember: If you have a problem with Nokia or a Nokia product the problem is you . Nokia is perfect. All Nokia products are perfect, do not speak ill of them ever.

Thx for posting this ....
I did this before, but without proof
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...476#post382476
__________________
Today my N900 was delivered .... what a nice dream
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#2384
I believe Nokia was playing down there expectations for n900 to cover there own back in-case it was a flop, now they've seen the buzz it created and amount of orders it took they talk it up a lot more now from what I've noticed
 

The Following User Says Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post:
Jack6428's Avatar
Posts: 635 | Thanked: 282 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Black Mesa Research Facility
#2385
You know what would be funny ? If Nokia all of a sudden said something like: "We are sorry, but we forgot that the units we have shipped all have a crucial faulty hardware configuration. Unfortunately the phones have to be returned for furhter adjustments and the release has to be delayed. We are sorry, but you will have to wait for Nokia N9xx and Maemo 6. Ok, bye."

 
Posts: 135 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#2386
Originally Posted by Jack6428 View Post
You know what would be funny ? If Nokia all of a sudden said something like: "We are sorry, but we forgot that the units we have shipped all have a crucial faulty hardware configuration. Unfortunately the phones have to be returned for furhter adjustments and the release has to be delayed. We are sorry, but you will have to wait for Nokia N9xx and Maemo 6. Ok, bye."

I would never buy Nokia again just because how can I trust that in the future my hardware wont fail?
 
Posts: 323 | Thanked: 180 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Gent, Belgium
#2387
For the ones planning to use the phone on the 3 network, there is some light !

I saw this bug-update in my mail:
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5315

Status RESOLVED, asking for internal testers to confirm the fix as often as possible.

It's going to be in every build based on or after 2009-47, whenever they make an official drop the the big public.

I hope that's pretty soon as my N900 has to run on 3 UK as of next week'ish ...
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Netweaver For This Useful Post:
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 39 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#2388
Originally Posted by tehsu View Post
Actually your wrong, There is a reason Nokia is moving from Symbian to Maemo, the N900 is the flagship phone, the phone to bring them back into the market, the phone to release a old but redesigned OS to the market, Symbian is not very loved around here. I don't know anyone that uses Symbian anymore, maybe where you live people have little knowledge of high end smart phones but here in Texas a lot of people pay for expensive phones, whatever there reason is to buy them, they do pay the money.
Possibly worth remembering the fact that on 23/10/09 all blogs/sites reporting on the delay of the device release stated:

"Nokia's Flagship N900 Delayed Unil November (NOK)"

Now I wonder where THEY got the idea this was Nokia's flagship device?



( Just to clarify, I am agreeing with you )
 
Posts: 135 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#2389
Originally Posted by stemfour View Post
Possibly worth remembering the fact that on 23/10/09 all blogs/sites reporting on the delay of the device release stated:

"Nokia's Flagship N900 Delayed Unil November (NOK)"

Now I wonder where THEY got the idea this was Nokia's flagship device?

Right, haha, the people on here make me laugh like they know everything before they research and discuss, they jump to conclusions. "Sorry no its not a flagship device because it's too expensive and it has a redesigned OS and it does everything plus more and ...."
 
dantonic's Avatar
Posts: 361 | Thanked: 108 times | Joined on Sep 2008
#2390
Originally Posted by dantonic View Post
I've just e-mailed the following to Amazon, let's see what they reply with:

Hello,

I have pre-ordered the Nokia N900 on Oct 17th. I've noticed that a rebate offer came out a few days ogo for $50. I've also noticed that one of the requirements for that rebate offer is that the purchase be made between Nov. 16th and Dec. 31st 2009.

Although I have pre-ordered the device on October 17th, I have not in fact purchased it yet.

I just wanted to ask and make sure that the invoice I will be receiving from you will show the actual Purchase date of the device. Meaning the date you will charge my Credit Card.

I also need this "actual" date to be reflected for the purpose of taking advantage of my square trade warranty. The Warranty is effective as of the purchase date, so I do not intend to pay for a warranty that will cover me from the day I pre-ordered, without having had a device in my hands for over a month.

Thank you very much for your time and your services.

Sincerely,
All right so apparently, even though it seems some think the "Order" date is what will count in regards to the rebate, I have received a different, positive response from Amazon, in regards to the question above. Those of us that have ordered from amazon before the Nov. 16th date might not have a problem at all getting the Rebate.

The original message I thought I sent did not go through apparently so I resent it adding a question in regards to the new $529 price being reflected on my order.

From Amazon:
Hello Davide,

The actual purchase date will be the date we charge your card. This will qualify you for your rebate.

Also your warranty will come in to effect from the purchase date also.

Whenever you pre-order a book, CD, video, DVD, software, or video game, the price we charge when we ship it to you will be the lowest price offered by Amazon.com between the time you placed your order and the release date. If the price changes, you'll see the update (or refund, if your shipment is already being prepared) within 24 hours.

Our Pre-Order Price Guarantee doesn't apply to items (or prices) offered by other sellers on our site.

We look forward to seeing you again soon.

Please let us know if this e-mail resolved your question:

If yes, click here:
...
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:27.