Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 17 hrs, 18 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 6 days, 5 hrs ago - more...
 |
Morpog |
2013-01-26
, 11:45
|
|
Posts: 956 |
Thanked: 2,628 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#231
|
Originally Posted by meegofan
Compare it with old XUL based Firefox from store. You will notice it for sure.
|
|
2013-01-26
, 13:19
|
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#232
|
Originally Posted by Morpog
Just did a quick speed comparison between the stock browser, fennec nightly 17.0 and Qt based Fennec. I loaded the site "www.finanzen.net" and measured the time. After doing this five times and averaging the values I got the following results:
Compare it with old XUL based Firefox from store. You will notice it for sure.
stock browser:
Loading Time (average): 18.9 sec
Standard deviation: 0.4 sec
Fennec Nightly 17.0:
Loading Time (average): 26.1 sec
Standard deviation: 1.3 sec
Qt based Fennec:
Loading Time (average): 18.1 sec
Standard deviation: 1.0 sec
Therefore, Qt based Fennec is about 4% faster than the stock browser and about 31% faster than Fennec Nightly 17.0. Compared to the store version of Fennec, the speed improvement might be even higher... Good job!!!
By the way, does the Qt based Fennec version have something like a cache? Prior to loading the website I deleted the cache in case of the stock browser and in case of Fennec Nightly 17.0. However, I haven't found such an option in case of Qt based Fennec.
Edit: Maybe I should have also mentioned that my N9 is running PR1.3 @1,2ghz and FasterN9 1.14!
I just got some more results from Ringmark 1.4.0 (http://rng.io/)
stock browser:
Ring 1: 37 failed / 94 passed
Fennec Nightly 17.0:
Ring 1: 13 failed / 134 passed
Qt based Fennec:
Ring 1: 12 failed / 137 passed
So, Qt based Fennec wins this competition as well!
I also tried to run Browsermark 2.0 (browsermark.rightware.com) but unfortunately it crashes using fennec browsers. Using the stock browser i get 948 points, which is a rather bad results I guess...
Last edited by meegofan; 2013-01-26 at 14:00.
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to meegofan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-01-26
, 14:37
|
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 285 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
@ Poland
|
#233
|
You can also try benching with: sunspider; peacekeeper. Fennec hangs on peacekeeper but you gotta wait for it, it will finish.
 |
|
2013-01-26
, 14:53
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#234
|
running peacekeeper now
score: 133
html5 capabilities 5/7
with desktop UA got
score: 123
html5 capabilities 6/7
Last edited by coderus; 2013-01-26 at 15:05.
score: 133
html5 capabilities 5/7
with desktop UA got
score: 123
html5 capabilities 6/7
Last edited by coderus; 2013-01-26 at 15:05.
|
|
2013-01-26
, 17:27
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#235
|
Fennec for Harmattan QML UI Demo #1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmleBTAUo-I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmleBTAUo-I
| The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-01-26
, 17:55
|
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#236
|
I just found the website http://loadtimer.org, which allows for the measuring of the loading times of popular websites. It also allows for comparison of the times with other devices. Unfortunately, with Qt based Fennec I can't copy and paste my URL-list into the textfield. Furthermore, "select all" is not possible within the textfield. Does anyone have the same issues with textfields?
 |
|
2013-01-26
, 18:19
|
|
Posts: 368 |
Thanked: 826 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ India
|
#237
|
Originally Posted by coderus
We are waiting for it
Fennec for Harmattan QML UI Demo #1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmleBTAUo-I
| The Following User Says Thank You to bibek For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-01-26
, 18:30
|
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 265 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#238
|
Originally Posted by qwazix
yes embedlite creates normal mozilla profile, and basically you are able to use mozilla API to receive history, bookmarks API... I need to wrap them into embedlite or provide example of component how to use them on top of embedlite API's
Does embedlite use the normal firefox profile folder for bookmarks, sync, history and such? Are those functions there or do we have to implement them from scratch?
For example the add bookmark button should just call a function that will be hooked to embedlite, or should I implement a way to save bookmarks? The same goes for history etc.
No you don't need to do anything from scratch.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to romaxa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-01-26
, 18:36
|
|
Posts: 79 |
Thanked: 37 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#239
|
Originally Posted by coderus
Looking great, can't wait for some kind of release i could comprehend the installation process. Keep up the great work.
Fennec for Harmattan QML UI Demo #1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmleBTAUo-I
|
|
2013-01-26
, 19:01
|
|
Posts: 956 |
Thanked: 2,628 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#240
|
Great idea with tap and hold. If you need help with graphics, just pm me or ping me on irc.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Morpog For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
| Tags |
| thread derailed |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00.