Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (8)
to Nokia N900 by whayong - 16 hrs, 4 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 12 hrs ago - more...
lasman |
2010-08-05
, 07:25
|
|
Posts: 33 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#271
|
Originally Posted by Flandry
Thanks for the reply. I will probably have to do that. However, the hildon application manager does not give me the same trouble. It is able to override this problem somehow. I don't know if there are some settings that can be changed in fapman to allow it do the same.
 |
|
2010-08-05
, 16:32
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#272
|
Originally Posted by rantom
Aaaah, the infamous upgrade bit mismatched stuff.
EDIT2: For some very, very odd reason I now lost from the regular Application's Manager the 3G/2G/Dual Mode Selection Applet, it's now listing the same updates as the fapman. :confused:
Let me guess, the updates you had have the same version as those already installed.
The issue is, someone borked the repos. Some packages in devel, testing and final aren't the same, that is, the binaries differ, but not the version. As a result, apt-get offers to "upgrade" them both ways.
Because the version is the same, it doesn't know that one version superseded the other, so when enabling -devel it offers to upgrade from devel, when enabling -testing but not devel it offers that version instead.
The reason why your updates jump up and down is because you enable and disable repos. Right now, if you disable -devel, you get upgrade to say 0.0.3. If you do so and then enable -devel, another update will appear, to 0.0.3.
To maintain sanity, all managers must share the same repos. I had quite a dig at that.
You're welcome. :P
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
|
|
2010-08-05
, 16:47
|
|
Posts: 729 |
Thanked: 155 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#273
|
Currently I have the problem that not all applications from extras(-devel/-testing) repositories have a date (option in settings to fetch it is activated) and when I sort the list to date they are shown at the bottom even if they are new.
Is that a problem from the repositories or FAP?
Is that a problem from the repositories or FAP?
|
|
2010-08-05
, 17:11
|
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#274
|
Originally Posted by DaSilva
You could try running fapman from the terminal with debug output enabled, it should show if there are any errors:
Currently I have the problem that not all applications from extras(-devel/-testing) repositories have a date (option in settings to fetch it is activated) and when I sort the list to date they are shown at the bottom even if they are new.
Is that a problem from the repositories or FAP?
Code:
sudo gainroot run-standalone.sh fapman -d
 |
|
2010-08-05
, 17:17
|
|
Posts: 2,154 |
Thanked: 2,186 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Hellsinki, Finland
|
#275
|
fapman randomly wants to update catalogs when I tap remove apps -icon. I think it's not necessary to download catalog data when you're about to remove an existing program...
__________________
If you're rich and you think I deserve a cold beer, you may donate one or two :-P
80's style stadium rock is back - FIRENOTE
Hi-Octane heavy metal - FORCE MAJEURE
If you're rich and you think I deserve a cold beer, you may donate one or two :-P
80's style stadium rock is back - FIRENOTE
Hi-Octane heavy metal - FORCE MAJEURE
|
|
2010-08-05
, 17:22
|
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#276
|
Version 0.6
* use custom repository and package list directories
* "fast remove": don't read full package lists immediately when package view is opened with the remove button
* search options: search from package display name, package name, package description (short and long)
* ability to blacklist installed packages
* show maemo-upgrade-description for upgradeable packages if it exists
* show dependencies and conflicts in the package selector
* option to play a sound on completed operations
* use hildon notes instead of dialogs to inform user about finished operations
* load the default wallpaper from /user/home/.backgrounds/background-1.png
* fade the wallpaper if loaded from the default location but not when loaded from /root/.fapman/wallpaper.png
- Faster application manager now instructs apt-get to use a completely separate repository list and package list cache
directories (it's at /opt/fapman-cache). This should minimize the conflicts with HAM. Running "update" from HAM should ensure it restores its own settings completely.
- Note that blacklisting packages hides them from the UI only. They can still get installed as dependencies for other packages.
I hope I didn't break anything with the changes
* use custom repository and package list directories
* "fast remove": don't read full package lists immediately when package view is opened with the remove button
* search options: search from package display name, package name, package description (short and long)
* ability to blacklist installed packages
* show maemo-upgrade-description for upgradeable packages if it exists
* show dependencies and conflicts in the package selector
* option to play a sound on completed operations
* use hildon notes instead of dialogs to inform user about finished operations
* load the default wallpaper from /user/home/.backgrounds/background-1.png
* fade the wallpaper if loaded from the default location but not when loaded from /root/.fapman/wallpaper.png
- Faster application manager now instructs apt-get to use a completely separate repository list and package list cache
directories (it's at /opt/fapman-cache). This should minimize the conflicts with HAM. Running "update" from HAM should ensure it restores its own settings completely.
- Note that blacklisting packages hides them from the UI only. They can still get installed as dependencies for other packages.
I hope I didn't break anything with the changes
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to hqh For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-08-05
, 18:40
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#277
|
Originally Posted by hqh
Doesn't work for me, it still can't find VertSMS when I type in portrait.
Version 0.6* search options: search from package display name, package name, package description (short and long)
|
|
2010-08-05
, 18:50
|
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#278
|
Originally Posted by rantom
Working fine here... You actually enabled the option to search from short description, right?
Doesn't work for me, it still can't find VertSMS when I type in portrait.
Also, make sure to change the settings *before* you type in your search (it's also possible to set them as default in options menu), there seems to be a bug which prevents all of the results from showing if you change the options after typing :P
|
|
2010-08-05
, 19:52
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#279
|
Originally Posted by hqh
Whoops, I thought that those were enabled by default. Yes, it does work now, thanks.
Working fine here... You actually enabled the option to search from short description, right?
Also, make sure to change the settings *before* you type in your search (it's also possible to set them as default in options menu), there seems to be a bug which prevents all of the results from showing if you change the options after typing :P
Any thoughts by the way regarding my missing updates? It's this post:#268
|
|
2010-08-05
, 20:53
|
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#280
|
Originally Posted by rantom
You already said that they are now showing the same updates :P
Whoops, I thought that those were enabled by default. Yes, it does work now, thanks.
#268
Have you compared the lists with the latest version of fapman?
If you have installed a package manually, HAM can possibly show an available update for it even though the version numbers are the same (in which case fapman won't show it). If it bothers you, just update it in HAM and stop worrying
Also HAM seems to list some updates outside of user/* categories too, are they visible in fapman if you list "all packages (advanced)"?If there is a real problem (a package is not shown as upgradeable even if one with an actually higher version number is available), then I'd like some more information... Like output of "dpkg --status packagename" for the offending packages and also the exact version numbers HAM lists in the details dialog.
| The Following User Says Thank You to hqh For This Useful Post: | ||
