|
2012-11-04
, 21:09
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
|
#2862
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DaftPunker For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-11-04
, 21:38
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 93 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#2863
|
Wow! Amazing performance! I've just followed your steps to put ED on a dedicated ext4 partition as explained here and I can really feel a very good improvement while interacting with heavy software like Libre Office, Iceweasel and Inkscape. The UI, specifically, is way more responsive now.
But the loading times that I'm getting are nowhere near what you got (33-36 seconds to perform a cold load on LibreOffice Writer with 2GB of swap on SD restarted a few seconds before doing the test). I'm using Kernel-Power, BatteryPatch (max 805Mhz, left keyboard slide open and LCD turned on) and SpeedPatch. Surprisingly (at least for me) enabling Swappolube with proposed settings increased the loading time of the same test to 52-57 seconds!
I believe that CSSU-thumb should make a good difference due to lower memory usage by Fremantle apps, but I'm asking myselft if such huge difference couldn't be also because I'm using armel repositories while you may have tested with armhf ones? Or maybe some LibreOffice-specific configuration file that I missed?
n900_, which one of the Estel's image did you use in this test? I'm currently using the ED image debian-m5-sulu.img.ext2 (dist-upgraded to wheezy) on separated ext4 partition on eMMC.
I'm very excited to achieve similiar performance results as you demonstrated in the two videos by following your steps.
The Following User Says Thank You to n900_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-11-04
, 21:46
|
|
Posts: 435 |
Thanked: 684 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Netherlands 020
|
#2864
|
|
2012-11-04
, 22:07
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
|
#2865
|
I'm using estel squeeze image. In this video I had ideal profile with 500-900MHz clock. Now I'm using dsp profile with 250-900 (better battery life). Libreoffice starting in 16-17seconds (cold start).
No swappolube and speed/battery patches. I had speedpatch and batterypatch and I think overall speed was slower than stock maemo @ 600MHz.
The Following User Says Thank You to DaftPunker For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-11-04
, 22:23
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 93 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#2866
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to n900_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-12-01
, 14:51
|
|
Posts: 141 |
Thanked: 190 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Barcelona - Spain
|
#2867
|
Hi everybody, I'm having some troubles and didn't find the answer, so far. I usually work with Easy Debian, but yesterday wanted to try Ubuntu. After installing I successfully opened it, but when I clicked on the menu button, many applications that I usually have with Easy Debian, were missing from drop-down menus.
I uninstalled Ubuntu and rebooted: but when I opened Easy Debian, the menu now had the same missing applications on the menu. It's not that the programs have been deleted: if I activate - for example 'Evince' - from command line or control panel, the application opens properly: it simply doesn't appear on the menu.
I tried many times to completely uninstall Debian LXDE from the app manager, and to download anew the 2 gb image: but no matter what i do, the Easy Debian menu doesn't return to its original default configuration.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Domenico
|
2012-12-11
, 21:30
|
|
Posts: 126 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#2868
|
|
2012-12-11
, 21:54
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 3,209 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Germany
|
#2869
|
I know this has been asked before but just to make sure, still no ideas as to how to install Skype in Easy Debian? The only flaw on the N900, the abscence of Skype sms, and what a big flaw it is...
The Following User Says Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-12-11
, 22:03
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 3,209 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Germany
|
#2870
|
Tags |
beta, debian, easy debian, extras-devel, fremantle, i <3 qole, squeeze |
Thread Tools | |
|
But the loading times that I'm getting are nowhere near what you got (33-36 seconds to perform a cold load on LibreOffice Writer with 2GB of swap on SD restarted a few seconds before doing the test). I'm using Kernel-Power, BatteryPatch (max 805Mhz, left keyboard slide open and LCD turned on) and SpeedPatch. Surprisingly (at least for me) enabling Swappolube with proposed settings increased the loading time of the same test to 52-57 seconds!
I believe that CSSU-thumb should make a good difference due to lower memory usage by Fremantle apps, but I'm asking myselft if such huge difference couldn't be also because I'm using armel repositories while you may have tested with armhf ones? Or maybe some LibreOffice-specific configuration file that I missed?
n900_, which one of the Estel's image did you use in this test? I'm currently using the ED image debian-m5-sulu.img.ext2 (dist-upgraded to wheezy) on separated ext4 partition on eMMC.
I'm very excited to achieve similiar performance results as you demonstrated in the two videos by following your steps.