![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:11
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#22
|
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:14
|
Posts: 398 |
Thanked: 301 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Texas
|
#23
|
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:14
|
Posts: 88 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#24
|
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:17
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#25
|
Hey, it's not my argument (I'm not knowledgeable enough on the low level details to have an opinion), it's their announcement that says so: The revamped UI relying on graphics acceleration and the new functionality built around the new supported hardware made it too complex to keep the compatibility between both architectures.
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:32
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#26
|
We expect an API break between Maemo 4 and Maemo 5, mainly due to the OMAP3 support, the hardware-based graphics acceleration and the changes in the Desktop UI and the Realtime Communication framework.
OMAP3 would be hardware, hardware-based graphics acceleration would again be hardware. The other two would seem to be software. 50% > little in my opinion.
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:45
|
Posts: 398 |
Thanked: 301 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Texas
|
#27
|
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:49
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#28
|
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:52
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#29
|
I think there is a common theme here. Nokia claims hardware is 2 out of 4 of the reasons for API breakage. GA claims rightfully so that it's not really hardware differences for the breakage. It's a business decision. Call it what it is and move on.
Frank
![]() |
2008-12-08
, 16:59
|
Posts: 253 |
Thanked: 104 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Midwest, USA
|
#30
|
Reggie Suplido