![]() |
2009-09-23
, 21:33
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#21
|
![]() |
2009-09-23
, 21:45
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#22
|
![]() |
2009-09-23
, 21:53
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#23
|
![]() |
2009-09-23
, 22:19
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#24
|
Don't tell Nokia that. If they find that the CPU in their not yet released crown jewel is outdated, they'll immediately stop working on its software and will concentrate solely on the next device.
![]() |
2009-09-24
, 12:46
|
|
Posts: 1,107 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Germany
|
#25
|
![]() |
2009-09-24
, 13:03
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#26
|
That Nokia N800 becomes less relevant over time is logical, and that people who love the features would eventually love a device akin to it but with some better hardware (like OMAP3) is also logical. Yet, we don't see that.
its being delayed and delayed, slowly but surely making it less relevant because of alternatives.
![]() |
2009-09-25
, 11:32
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#27
|
![]() |
2009-09-25
, 12:45
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#28
|
![]() |
2009-09-25
, 14:37
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#29
|
And the alternatives are?
The Following User Says Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post: | ||