|
2009-11-27
, 23:51
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#22
|
As far as features go, these are some concerns that I have that I'm afraid wont be addressed:
- Lack of lower video quality selection (Ex: 640x480@30fps, 320x240@30fps, etc)
|
2009-11-28
, 03:56
|
Posts: 203 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#23
|
Since I've used every Nseries flagship device, I'll say this is a step back, but probably typical of first gen firmware. The N95 8gb and N97 both had similar performance on the initial builds. I hope its fixed in December, because it looks like the framerate is subpar, it drops too many frames when moving around, and there needs to be some image stability feature to help it stop shaking. Video looked noisy, too, even in good light.
All in all, its still better than 90% of what's out there.
|
2009-11-28
, 17:33
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#24
|
Is this true? Would be really bad... I usually take videos, edit them right on my phone and upload them to some web service (or send them by mail) via 3G.
I'm not gonna edit full quality files on this phone, nor am I going to upload the resulting files via 3G. I want something like 320x240@15fps as an option... I've never owned any device that was capable of recording video but didn't offer a way to decrease quality for reduced file size.
While digging for standard icons for various services for Shepherd I ran into a few camera icons suggesting some (currently disabled) resolutions:
The video resolutions are 800x480, 640x480 and 320x240
The camera resolutions are 5, 3.5 (wide), 3 and 1.3 megapixels
Doesn't mean much, but hey, at least we know somebody in Nokia was/is at some point thinking about extra resolutions
The Following User Says Thank You to jessi3k3 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-12-01
, 21:56
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#25
|
|
2009-12-02
, 00:11
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#26
|
|
2009-12-05
, 22:24
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#27
|
|
2009-12-26
, 03:33
|
Posts: 318 |
Thanked: 49 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#28
|
|
2009-12-26
, 03:52
|
|
Posts: 305 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ 'Nam
|
#29
|
|
2009-12-26
, 13:46
|
Posts: 318 |
Thanked: 49 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#30
|
Another question about video and pictures. Does the camera load up/activate faster then the n95? Does the n900 take less time to process the image? I'm curious if the faster processor helps.