![]() |
2011-05-29
, 14:16
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#22
|
![]() |
2011-05-29
, 14:43
|
Posts: 1,326 |
Thanked: 1,524 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#23
|
Well like my initial post was hinting at, u-boot and other "booting" methods give us two/three options tops, with a hypervisor you can have as many images of os's as you like and just pick and choose, so we could have a lot more than just maemo/meego, plus we can just shut one down and start another one up, and then flick back to the original one without having to re-boot etc.
There are lot of advantages to have this rather than u-boot, whether or not the advantages out weigh the amount of work needed to create it is another matter....
The Following User Says Thank You to MINKIN2 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-05-29
, 18:50
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Birmingham
|
#24
|
I think the /solution/ is to simply have /one/ good OS that can have anything you want loaded on it. Maemo's a good example: We don't /need/ to dual-boot Linux usually, because we either have it natively or can run a Debian(etc) chroot.
Now, perhaps Maemo's not going to be the end-all-be-all OS, but we should be thinking in terms of that instead of VMing everything(which /will/ reduce performance).
![]() |
2011-05-29
, 18:52
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Birmingham
|
#25
|
Ubuntu Maverick. I'll get around to running Unity 2D with GLES acceleration sometime.
If we do get a HV on the N900, whee, switching back and forth between Maemo, Android and MeeGo!
![]() |
2011-05-29
, 18:54
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Birmingham
|
#26
|
Just out of curiosity, is this the type of thing that you were thinking of? Super Jumbo
The thread has not been updated for a few weeks now, (would like to hear how the progress is going myself) but it is a very nice teaser of what could be possible.
![]() |
Tags |
good idea, just shoot me, kill me now, suicidal, vmware |
Thread Tools | |
|
Well that doesn't look very good then, I don't know much about Maverick, but I'll have a read about it, is that slim or bloated? The ESXi box I built and tested worked extremely well, but it was a lot higher spec than mobile devices, but then again I was running a lot of VM to test it properly...
The main problem I found was the hardware support, the free version of ESXi from VMware covers a lot of hardware, but I had to buy a gigabit intel NIC because the on board wasn't supported, so I can see (if this ever does work) the hardware support/drivers would be an issue anyway, especially if they are closed, as I guess that would make things even more difficult....
As for why, your right, easy deb takes care of most of my needs, but VMs have a load of plus points too, I think it is a case of what you use personally, but I do agree the easy deb route is brilliant without a doubt, and we do have uboot/multi-boot as well...... just thinking about the future....and furthering this sort of application of VMs would be a good thing