The Following User Says Thank You to Bernard For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-29
, 11:24
|
|
Posts: 513 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Sweden
|
#22
|
|
2011-09-29
, 11:27
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#23
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-29
, 11:29
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#24
|
Would be pretty sweet with 50€ phones with linux & Qt. Cheap hackable linux devices sounds like utopia. I'm excited. (Especially as a Qt developer)
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-29
, 11:33
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 431 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#25
|
|
2011-09-29
, 11:36
|
|
Posts: 549 |
Thanked: 698 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#26
|
I doubt very much though that any linux based distro will run as efficient as Symbian. AFAIK even a dumbed down one like Android suck more juice than Symbian and Harmattan even more. Sure native code all the way through is going to help but still I think Symbian will be more efficient.
The Following User Says Thank You to Daneel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-29
, 11:37
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#27
|
|
2011-09-29
, 11:44
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#28
|
What do you mean by efficient? If you are referring to battery life i can't agree with you.
The Linux kernel is modular, that is why most embedded systems(where efficiency is VERY important) use it.
I would also like to know on which grounds you are basing the inefficiency of Harmattan, unless you own an N9, i don't understand how you arrived to that conclusion.
|
2011-09-29
, 11:46
|
|
Posts: 513 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Sweden
|
#29
|
What do you mean by efficient? If you are referring to battery life i can't agree with you.
The Linux kernel is modular, that is why most embedded systems(where efficiency is VERY important) use it.
I would also like to know on which grounds you are basing the inefficiency of Harmattan, unless you own an N9, i don't understand how you arrived to that conclusion.
|
2011-09-29
, 11:48
|
Posts: 468 |
Thanked: 610 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
|
#30
|
I doubt very much though that any linux based distro will run as efficient as Symbian. AFAIK even a dumbed down one like Android suck more juice than Symbian and Harmattan even more. Sure native code all the way through is going to help but still I think Symbian will be more efficient.
Tags |
deb & mitm, deb obsoleted, deb rox, dumbphones, linux, linuxmelting, meltemi, rpm sux |
Thread Tools | |
|
Qt for Symbian still has a lot of rough edges, and judging from that experience a lot of people (including myself), don't believe Nokia would be able to bring Qt to series 40 or any other new OS in a reasonable amount of time, in a good working state.
But if they intend to use a linux distribution as a base, that would be a totally different situation. Or nokia intends to use a similar strategy as in the N900, a device that is effectively an internet tablet + Series 40 phone glued together. All interesting speculation, let us wait and see.