|
2010-04-18
, 19:00
|
Posts: 1,751 |
Thanked: 844 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#3032
|
I suspect there would be no negative consequences locking at 1ghz, despite what many have said; the noop loops are very power efficient, and even at 1ghz, the chip isn't doing much. I left mine idling at 1ghz for 20 minutes and the temperature hung around 3C over ambient (vs ambient at 250mhz).
Even under moderate load that was averaging 500mhz, locking at 1ghz only increased CPU temp by 3C.
I would suspect that running intensive operations at 250mhz would heat the CPU more than idling at 1ghz..
|
2010-04-18
, 19:07
|
Posts: 156 |
Thanked: 90 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#3033
|
i got lots of error when i tried to run script for analyzing time_in_state (by rooted) - rev6 from wiki.maemo.org/overclocking
below is a bit modified version that run at least on my x-term. I don't understand why original file didn't run.
then i noticed that "used" and "when busy" give same readings. I don't understand how this when busy is derived from "time_in_state" file. At least i have there only two columns (freq and time).
The Following User Says Thank You to rooted For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-18
, 19:23
|
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#3034
|
|
2010-04-18
, 20:53
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#3035
|
|
2010-04-18
, 20:56
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#3036
|
I've been trying Titan's ideal kernel (500-850) and the battery drains alot faster then with Leho's 250-800 Mhz.
Are you guys noticing the same issue ?
|
2010-04-18
, 20:59
|
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#3037
|
|
2010-04-18
, 21:01
|
Posts: 946 |
Thanked: 1,650 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#3038
|
please help,
Yesterday I was playing "OPEN ARENA" On my N900, and After about 30 minutes, he hung up and not want to Connect!
My N900 is not more Booting
is not reloading.
Not in League Mode FLASH.
Just glows red, which then hang up.
already happened to someone?
I know it's my fault, but there is some geito to recover it?
I was using the Kernel Operating Titan XLV In 850Mh Minimum 1Ghz and Maximo.
Sera that he DIED?? help
|
2010-04-18
, 21:04
|
Posts: 946 |
Thanked: 1,650 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#3039
|
I've been trying Titan's ideal kernel (500-850) and the battery drains alot faster then with Leho's 250-800 Mhz.
Are you guys noticing the same issue ?
The Following User Says Thank You to titan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-18
, 21:04
|
Posts: 310 |
Thanked: 383 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#3040
|
Thread Tools | |
|
Even under moderate load that was averaging 500mhz, locking at 1ghz only increased CPU temp by 3C.
I would suspect that running intensive operations at 250mhz would heat the CPU more than idling at 1ghz..