|
2015-07-02
, 17:15
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#372
|
You have things mixed up again. I highlighted the very clear difference between the Russians claiming that open-sourcing everything would be complete by the end of July (and SFv2.0) and Jolla saying there was a roadmap / we'll talk soon etc. It was plainly apparent that there would be no major progress soon. He refused to accept there was any difference, went into a rage and started trolling.
Lol, just lol, haters gonna hate, here you have jolla officially state they will open whole of _their_ source, bbbbut mah narrative, russian minister who cares??? This article has jolla as source not some russian official, go hate harder
|
2015-07-02
, 17:21
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#373
|
I highlighted the very clear difference between the Russians claiming that open-sourcing everything would be complete by the end of July (and SFv2.0) and Jolla saying there was a roadmap / we'll talk soon etc. It was plainly apparent that there would be no major progress soon.
But, but, the Russian guy claimed the process would start in June and it'd all be open by the close of July with the release of 2.0 :-o The usual suspects here jumped in to claim that was the word of god, and non-committal statements (to the contrary) by Saarnio and others at Jolla ("info soon" / "not ready to talk about it") must surely be misunderstandings. Does this mean we won't have a fully open OS by the end of this month? Some people here must be shocked at this turn of events.
He refused to accept there was any difference, went into a rage and started trolling. I pointed this out because the rhetoric / PR-line was again significantly different between the two parties, not because it required any deductive capacity to come to the conclusion that the Russian claim was horseshit.
|
2015-07-02
, 17:31
|
|
Posts: 1,389 |
Thanked: 1,857 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel
|
#374
|
See now you're saying something different, here's what you claimed the exchange was about in your last post:
Now you're saying it was about the conflict of official lines between the two parties, in that last post you suggested that users (szopin) were already taking as "gospel" the Russian gov't's line, that it was coming in ~June & would be done by ~July.
As I recall he was merely trying to correct your (quite correct) attack on the claims for June/July delivery for opening the remainder of SF by saying: "But that's the Russian official's words, these are the official Jolla peoples words, they're what matter, see here".
|
2015-07-02
, 17:39
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#375
|
|
2015-07-02
, 17:45
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#376
|
|
2015-07-02
, 17:54
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#377
|
|
2015-07-02
, 17:56
|
|
Posts: 1,389 |
Thanked: 1,857 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel
|
#378
|
Let me point out that the "lack of communication problem" is your perception, and perhaps that of other people. I am perfectly happy with the level of communcation that they've provided thus far. At the very least, it's a lot more information than larger organisations are prepared to give you. Whether it's ideal or not is another matter, but I'm perfectly happy as a backer.
On another subject:
https://twitter.com/JaakkoRoppola/st...72640543830016
https://twitter.com/Vilhartti/status/616575731515174912
EDIT: fixed 2nd twitter link
|
2015-07-02
, 17:58
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#379
|
|
2015-07-02
, 18:24
|
Posts: 338 |
Thanked: 496 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#380
|
Tags |
moral hazard, paypal refund |
Thread Tools | |
|
Of all the things I posted, I'm not particularly sure why you highlighted my story about the E4.5 source other than that it involved you. It was used to illustrate the fact that UT devs tend to be very responsive to any serious queries, feedback or contributions aimed at them (personally & institutionally) & do it in the open, and because it was a case that quite a few posters here would already be familiar with. If I got some kind of minor technicality wrong re: the case, then it's probably because it's several months ago, and it doesn't really make the point any less valid.
From the tenor of your response, I assume you find (some of) my posts a mixture of very frustrating and interesting or insightful. Of course I get things wrong, particularly details ... but then all of us are working on ridiculously scant information. If you think the overall conclusions I come to or analysis I post have some kind of ring of truth or strike close to home, then maybe act accordingly rather than wishing I knew more (either about Jolla or soft/hardware generally) and came to a different conclusion.
I won't say no to your invitation, it's very kind, but I think it's unlikely to happen soon as I have a pretty full schedule of travel for most of the rest of the year.
In the mean time, I agree with some of the other posters ... whilst it's not in your job description to be a font of product information, I'm sure everyone would be fascinated to know why nothing of the tablet has been shown for 4 months (or even the software, if the hardware is in a dysfunctional state) and what's going on. It'd be much more productive for everyone than either engaging me in discourse or chewing me out.
P.S. My 'job' has effectively been making relatively accurate analysis from highly imperfect data (and my imp. knowledge) ... or at least more accurate than most other people trying.
Last edited by bluefoot; 2015-07-02 at 16:47.