|
2015-04-30
, 09:35
|
Posts: 602 |
Thanked: 735 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
@ Nantes, France
|
#372
|
|
2015-04-30
, 09:45
|
Posts: 602 |
Thanked: 735 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
@ Nantes, France
|
#373
|
Jolla's way is to release often to bring improvements more rapidly. It also allows rapid feedback on how the platform is evolving, instead of taking something like 8 to 10 months preparing big update that "makes it work before making it work better" and then findinf that changes were not welcome after all. There are always caveats on different update models, but honestly I prefer current, more rapid incremental updates compared to waiting for next PR with N900 or N9.
|
2015-04-30
, 09:58
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#375
|
...basic functionality is still missing (voicemail notification, global copy&paste, paid apps) or incomplete (CalDAV, proper email client, Exchange).
I know people who use Jolla with company Exchange also, so I wouldn't say that the feature is missing.
The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-04-30
, 09:59
|
|
Posts: 141 |
Thanked: 359 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Italy
|
#376
|
I think we all do. And I also think this is not really the point here but priorities.
Read again January blog post about the coming features, you'll read "Lockscreen media controls" or "private browsing". Those are nice features, for sure. But those are not mandatory features when the basic you can expect from a smartphone is not provided:
- no buggy contacts sync
- no buggy calendar sync (check on TJC how many people have missed appointments because of this crap)
- voicemail notification (this is a damned phone guys!).
All this discussion is about priorities, nothing more. And obviously, tablet is not one with such a buggy OS. But maybe we have to also try to understand their priorities in term of business, because for such a small company, this is probably a survival question. Just a question of perspective.
The Following User Says Thank You to mikelima For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-04-30
, 10:21
|
|
Posts: 1,092 |
Thanked: 4,995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ beautiful cave
|
#377
|
|
2015-04-30
, 10:30
|
Posts: 233 |
Thanked: 532 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
|
#378
|
Also IMHO every UI change Jolla have done has been a step backwards and 2.0 continues that trend. The multitasking got worse with the Qt change and the limited RAM in the device hit home. I get better multitasking out of Android because Sony just threw 2 & 3gb of RAM at the problem. :-)
|
2015-04-30
, 12:33
|
Posts: 602 |
Thanked: 735 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
@ Nantes, France
|
#379
|
Well not everyone has the same priority.
For example I do not care for the calendar that much, and I use the music player quite a bit.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to romu For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-04-30
, 12:39
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Jan 2014
@ India
|
#380
|
Also, what are basic mobile platform features vary depending on who you ask. If you ask me, there has not been any new fully featured mobile OS's since Symbian. All of them lack things that were present in Symbian years ago (including fully supporting both landscape and horizontal use throughout UI), but because it's Android/iOS such things are not considered basic anymore. As for Qt upgrade, doing upgrade first and doing new stuff against new version is most likely faster than doing everything against old version and then having even more painful route to upgrade. So, it's never going to be like "make everything work and upgrade only then".