Reply
Thread Tools
aflegg's Avatar
Posts: 1,463 | Thanked: 81 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ UK
#31
Originally Posted by dont View Post
What to do about that Diablo promise? Re-label the next minor release Diablo and move on ...
Interesting idea, if entirely unsubstantiated :-)

Like GeneralAntilles, I was under the impression that Chinook would be the codename for maemo 4.x, which meant Diablo would be 5.x and Elephanta 6.x.

If Diablo is 4.1 after all, it seems odd to have a codename for a minor release; but if it's a major release, why not bump the major version number? If it's just OS2008 + WiMAX support, 4.1 makes sense (but not, necessarily the Diablo name). That'd make OS2009/maemo 5.0 == Elephanta.

Aha! They want to make Elephanta maemo 5.0 so that the initial letter corresponds to its position in the (English) alphabet. That'd make maemo 6.0 one of Foehn or Freemantle. What they do when they get back to "G" and can't use "Gregale", I've no idea :-)
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
Now known as
Jaffa
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#32
Originally Posted by dont View Post
What to do about that Diablo promise? Re-label the next minor release Diablo and move on ...
"Minor" is relative.

The ability to upgrade without losing apps will be MAJOR for the typical consumer.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 91 | Thanked: 45 times | Joined on Dec 2005
#33
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
...soon.
Perhaps explaining the recent price cuts?
 
luca's Avatar
Posts: 1,137 | Thanked: 402 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Catalunya
#34
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
"Minor" is relative.

The ability to upgrade without losing apps will be MAJOR for the typical consumer.
Provided there are further releases to upgrade to.......
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to luca For This Useful Post:
Red's Avatar
Posts: 155 | Thanked: 63 times | Joined on May 2007 @ UK
#35
A fair point Luca.
__________________
N800, OS2008 + E51. 3.5G. Warning, this post contains at least one nut and is a source of hyperbole.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#36
Originally Posted by luca View Post
Provided there are further releases to upgrade to.......
You're doubtful that the ITs have a future?
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 479 | Thanked: 58 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Dubai, UAE
#37
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
"Minor" is relative.

The ability to upgrade without losing apps will be MAJOR for the typical consumer.
That would be me. If only I could reflash my firmware now without needing to reinstall all my apps again...
__________________
N800 running OS2008 with 2 x 16GB SDHC connected over WiFi or via BT to Nokia E51's HSDPA/3G network
 
Posts: 479 | Thanked: 58 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Dubai, UAE
#38
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
You're doubtful that the ITs have a future?
Doubtful that Nokia will stick with the current hardware/CPU, I guess. With MIDs being the hot thing these days, Nokia may need to up the ante and start defending a segment that they have created.
__________________
N800 running OS2008 with 2 x 16GB SDHC connected over WiFi or via BT to Nokia E51's HSDPA/3G network
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#39
well there is always hacker editions, those should be more maintainable that way...
(inplace updates that is)
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#40
Originally Posted by luca View Post
Wasn't chinook supposed to do that?
What is this, the fourth time now that I've told you that that feature had always been planned for Diablo?

Originally Posted by dont View Post
Ok, let me throw in a completely unfounded, made-up conspiracy theory.
<_<
>_>

Originally Posted by dont View Post
Then Intel really starts to move on its low power SoC devices and it looks like Nokia are going to have to switch processors soon and that is going to seriously fork the code.
It doesn't look like anything of the sort. Sure, Intel is pushing the lower-power x86, but they're still nowhere near the efficiency of the ARM stuff. It'll be at least another year before they can match it (probably more), and you can be certain that TI isn't gonna be sitting on their hands with the OMAP stuff while Intel is trying to catch up.

Besides, Nokia has a huge investment in ARM and OMAP, and a very strong relationship with TI (as I've mentioned in other threads). They get huge volume discounts on the OMAP stuff with because of their phones, and they know the OMAP. These are not things you throw away lightly for what amounts to a less efficient, and more expensive processor lineup targeted at larger and more expensive devices (the MIDs are somewhere between the NITs and the UMPCs) that you don't really have any experience with.

No, Nokia isn't dropping OMAP anytime soon.

Originally Posted by dont View Post
What to do about that Diablo promise? Re-label the next minor release Diablo and move on ...
Look at the reaction of 770 owners to the OS2007 issue, there's no way they would do this again with N800/N810 owners, especially not after promising them support through what pretty much everybody understood to be OS2009.

Promises aside, they can't possibly expect to get away with only a single major revision for the N810. Something like that could effectively kill the platform. . . .
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:31.