Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 840 | Thanked: 823 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#31
I'm from the UK, I remember windows mobile in shops everywhere. If you were after a smartphone back then you would have come across it everywhere you went. It's just that smartphones are becoming more mainstream, it's not that you couldn't find WM in UK stores. There were plenty, and I remember the sony ericsson ones they had. In fact if you didn't buy a Nokia smartphone you were more than likely buying a Windows Mobile smartphone. Windows mobile was fairly popular once but in a very bad decline, which prompted MS to rebrand it as Windows Phone and drop photon. Make no mistake, wndows mobile DID leave a bad taste in some peoples mouths. The reason you don't see it in stores NOW is because it's not being released on new phones anymore but there were as many WM phones in stores as there is WP7 now. BTW, Symbian 3 was also redesigned from the ground up and reason b) makes no difference to the low sales of WP7.

Last edited by Cue; 2011-05-20 at 03:54.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Cue For This Useful Post:
Posts: 28 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#32
Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
One of the leading market research and analytics companies in the world. They were one of the few that accurately predicted the complete and utter failure of the Iphone.
yea. i worked for them (among others) on some market research contracts when i was in india. Usually, when we cant fulfill the requirements of the contract, we just make things up. fake surveys, fake numbers, fake CEOs. the value of these surveys is not on what its based as it usually is more than 50% fake (up to 80%), its more on how people will react to the results.

So these numbers here dont prove or disprove anything except the past. future is a different thing and it will be interesting to see how it goes. especially since this nokia+ms= <3 thing

Also, concerning WM vs WP. The way i see it is, people that were buying smartphones 5 years ago know what is WM, but they are early adopters of new tech, so they must also be well aware and informed that WP is completely different.

also i dont think wm was that bad. i actually find it more useful than wp7 as of now and i had to chose between wm and ios at the time and i took the att tilt and never regreted it. with the proper multitasking, copy/paste, ms exchange, office, etc. it was the best option for me.

to danramos


also, i dont know you and i might be wrong (and im sorry if i am, but its hard to get the tone used when reading...), but you seem like an arrogant prick to me by the way you respond to others and it seems the only thing you can do is disagree. so now im gonna disagree with you:

you blame others to use annecdotal evidence but you did it yourself

its not a os update, its a new os so dont say it comes from year 1920 or something. its brand new, no matter how you put it, you were wrong, just admit it.

you make assumptions based on nothing ("many in the industry are interpreting from the longstanding history of these lines of products" really? who?) when i look at a review online, they tell me what the product is, not what the company did 5 years ago

you say fm radio transmitter is useless (when its ****ing awesome) and you think most people have a new car with bluetooth when the avereage car age in the USA is 10 years old and still have cassette player.

you say its just been 4 years since iphone so teens should remember the wm experience when in reality, nobody gived a damn about smartphones back then except businesses. like kojacker, azkay and richwhite proved, even if there actually WERE wm phones in almost every store selling phones, most dont remember that because NOBODY CARED ABOUT SMARTPHONES 5 YEARS AGO.

you say "I still think that you're just not looking at the bigger picture and myopically focused on the idea that Windows Phone 7 is supposed to be new code. I don't think the broader market of consumers will care about that detail"
when in fact, the detail is the ****in W in wp7 that no mass consumer will give a damn about because they never heard of wm before anyway and are not dumb enough to think its the same thing anyway and will TRY the phone, in their hand, in the store, and see how it works because mass consumers buy phones in retail outlets.
You really think a 15years old kid will care about wp7 vs wm??? Really? whos not looking at the big picture here?

you post a stupid quote wich is in no way relevant to the subject and posted by someone who is clearly biased. By the way, this ******ed argument was used by apple fanboys few years ago when android just arrived on the market. guess whos laughing now?

finally, id like to say that I DONT KNOW what will happen to WP7 and Nokia and i dont pretend to know. I dont think they are doomed, but maybe they are. Time will tell...and time is not 1 quarter, id say 1-2years, like the time it took for android to really get momentum.

...sorry for the rant...and once again, sorry if i got you wrong, but thats how i felt it reading your posts.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to choufleur47 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 619 | Thanked: 691 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#33
I actually agree with alot with what you say analysis wise - but I said nothing as arguing about opinionative stuff like this that has no metric is that the argument will never end, so why bother ?

hehe either way we will find out soon enough.

Originally Posted by choufleur47 View Post
yea. i worked for them (among others) on some market research contracts when i was in india. Usually, when we cant fulfill the requirements of the contract, we just make things up. fake surveys, fake numbers, fake CEOs. the value of these surveys is not on what its based as it usually is more than 50% fake (up to 80%), its more on how people will react to the results.

So these numbers here dont prove or disprove anything except the past. future is a different thing and it will be interesting to see how it goes. especially since this nokia+ms= <3 thing

Also, concerning WM vs WP. The way i see it is, people that were buying smartphones 5 years ago know what is WM, but they are early adopters of new tech, so they must also be well aware and informed that WP is completely different.

also i dont think wm was that bad. i actually find it more useful than wp7 as of now and i had to chose between wm and ios at the time and i took the att tilt and never regreted it. with the proper multitasking, copy/paste, ms exchange, office, etc. it was the best option for me.

to danramos


also, i dont know you and i might be wrong (and im sorry if i am, but its hard to get the tone used when reading...), but you seem like an arrogant prick to me by the way you respond to others and it seems the only thing you can do is disagree. so now im gonna disagree with you:

you blame others to use annecdotal evidence but you did it yourself

its not a os update, its a new os so dont say it comes from year 1920 or something. its brand new, no matter how you put it, you were wrong, just admit it.

you make assumptions based on nothing ("many in the industry are interpreting from the longstanding history of these lines of products" really? who?) when i look at a review online, they tell me what the product is, not what the company did 5 years ago

you say fm radio transmitter is useless (when its ****ing awesome) and you think most people have a new car with bluetooth when the avereage car age in the USA is 10 years old and still have cassette player.

you say its just been 4 years since iphone so teens should remember the wm experience when in reality, nobody gived a damn about smartphones back then except businesses. like kojacker, azkay and richwhite proved, even if there actually WERE wm phones in almost every store selling phones, most dont remember that because NOBODY CARED ABOUT SMARTPHONES 5 YEARS AGO.

you say "I still think that you're just not looking at the bigger picture and myopically focused on the idea that Windows Phone 7 is supposed to be new code. I don't think the broader market of consumers will care about that detail"
when in fact, the detail is the ****in W in wp7 that no mass consumer will give a damn about because they never heard of wm before anyway and are not dumb enough to think its the same thing anyway and will TRY the phone, in their hand, in the store, and see how it works because mass consumers buy phones in retail outlets.
You really think a 15years old kid will care about wp7 vs wm??? Really? whos not looking at the big picture here?

you post a stupid quote wich is in no way relevant to the subject and posted by someone who is clearly biased. By the way, this ******ed argument was used by apple fanboys few years ago when android just arrived on the market. guess whos laughing now?

finally, id like to say that I DONT KNOW what will happen to WP7 and Nokia and i dont pretend to know. I dont think they are doomed, but maybe they are. Time will tell...and time is not 1 quarter, id say 1-2years, like the time it took for android to really get momentum.

...sorry for the rant...and once again, sorry if i got you wrong, but thats how i felt it reading your posts.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Frappacino For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#34
Originally Posted by choufleur47 View Post
yea. i worked for them (among others) on some market research contracts when i was in india. Usually, when we cant fulfill the requirements of the contract, we just make things up. fake surveys, fake numbers, fake CEOs. the value of these surveys is not on what its based as it usually is more than 50% fake (up to 80%), its more on how people will react to the results.
So you admit to telling 50-80% lies? What makes you think I should or can believe you now?
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 
Posts: 28 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#35
50 to 80% lies in the surveys we did yes. its not like i had a choice, i was an employee. how often do you tell your boss : hey boss, i dont care if you lose this 25k $ project, i wont do what you tell me to do.

i went there for a management internship and i was lured to this stupid job. i had no money as i am a full time student and i was paid 300$ a month there working 50h/week, barely enough to survive. so my little fancy morals got out of the way and i decided to shut the hell up and do what i was told to do.

but you clearly have superior morals and are a better person than me.
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#36
Originally Posted by choufleur47 View Post
50 to 80% lies in the surveys we did yes. its not like i had a choice, i was an employee. how often do you tell your boss : hey boss, i dont care if you lose this 25k $ project, i wont do what you tell me to do.

i went there for a management internship and i was lured to this stupid job. i had no money as i am a full time student and i was paid 300$ a month there working 50h/week, barely enough to survive. so my little fancy morals got out of the way and i decided to shut the hell up and do what i was told to do.

but you clearly have superior morals and are a better person than me.
Apparently, 100% of statisticians claiming that 50-80% of statistics are lies miss the point when their own claim is dismissed as a likely lie just on statistical proof alone!

I can't stop giggling at your response.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 
Posts: 28 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#37
you really are an arrogant prick.
and i didnt miss the point. i dont lie 50-80% of the time.
with a gun on your head, you would still tell the truth if asked to lie? whatever your answer would be to that question, i could call you a liar.

so just stop your childish ********, you're spending too much time fapping on forums
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to choufleur47 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on May 2011
#38
I have never felt the need to register at maemo.org despite having the N900 for a over a year now simply because the answers to all the question one may have have already been posted.
The reason I joined the forum today is to agree with others on this thread and say that danramos is indeed an arrogant prick.
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#39
Somebody was frustrated enough to create himself a second account. Welcome "new guy".
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 
Posts: 2 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#40
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
Somebody was frustrated enough to create himself a second account. Welcome "new guy".
PS: Garyc2011... I suggest you seek immediate medical attention for whatever that is that you've got. Please, we're concerned for you.

I must have touched a raw nerve........

What I have is a 6th sense and an uncanny gift for spotting dumb yankers like yourself

Please don't be so arrogant when replying to posters on here, I know most yanks are under-educated and loud mouthed, so please don't be so stereotypical.

Back to the point, how is maemo doing this weather, is all well in maemo land or has maemo become the sick man of the mobile world ?
 
Reply

Tags
competitors, goodbye nokia

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:46.