Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 9 hrs, 19 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 21 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2009-09-26
, 16:41
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#412
|
A tweet from twitter
"Wow i had 26 apps open on my N900 - 6 sites running ajax, music player, email and more - and no real performance difference"
"Wow i had 26 apps open on my N900 - 6 sites running ajax, music player, email and more - and no real performance difference"
|
|
2009-09-26
, 17:38
|
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#413
|
Originally Posted by benny1967
Incomplete how? If you mean MMS, I personally can't care less about MMS and so do most cellular users. Quoting today's Slashdot article, "In 2008, MMS made up just 2.5 percent of all messages sent from phones worldwide, meaning about 97.5 percent were SMS text messages, according to ABI Research. ABI expects the MMS share to grow to just 4.5 percent by 2014." Other than MMS, I do not see what your S40 phone can do that N900 can't.
the N900 will be incomplete even compared to an average S40-phone, and of course it lacks a whole lot of features I use regularly with my S60 phone.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-09-26
, 17:40
|
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#414
|
Originally Posted by sachin007
But none of them run in portrait mode and he can't send them over MMS! FAIL, right? =)
A tweet from twitter "Wow i had 26 apps open on my N900 - 6 sites running ajax, music player, email and more - and no real performance difference"
 |
|
2009-09-26
, 17:54
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#415
|
Originally Posted by fms
that's not the point, is it?
I personally can't care less about MMS and so do most cellular users.
even if they use such features only once a year, most people expect them to be available on a >500,- phone when they need them.
also, i don't quite understand your being so upset. the phone part on the N900 is far behind. if you don't need these missing features in a phone, be happy. but don't try to deny that they are missing.
 |
|
2009-09-26
, 18:04
|
|
Posts: 106 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
|
#416
|
Originally Posted by benny1967
Care to expand on what's missing exactly? Other than MMS of course
the phone part on the N900 is far behind. if you don't need these missing features in a phone, be happy. but don't try to deny that they are missing.
I do agree that a £500 mobile phone should have MMS however, dam I can go to my local supermarket and get a phone for peanuts that supports it... ironically it would probably be a Nokia phone
 |
|
2009-09-26
, 18:08
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#417
|
Originally Posted by ragnar
Just for the record, the "irony" part is not directed to Nokia, but to all so called "experts" that keep saying Nokia should do this or that and that they know better.
Kind of, yes.
For instance, I'm not involved in the marketing. But take the N800 and N810, they weren't heavily marketed, in relation to how Nokia usually markets their devices. I (as a purely personal opinion) would have seen heavy marketing for them as counter-productive. They weren't ready for mass markets, on many levels, the UX being one of them.
If some John Doe would have been targeted and found by a N800 ad, and he would have gone through the trouble of trying to see the device and perhaps even buy one, and get disappointed over what he bought, it wouldn't have been very good for either Maemo or Nokia in the long run.
I remember Nokia World: I was also surprised at the way the N900 was heavily downplayed.
Now I understand why, there are many elements not ready for mass consumption. I am glad Nokia has been open about those, in fact.
| The Following User Says Thank You to mrojas For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-09-26
, 18:15
|
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#418
|
Originally Posted by benny1967
What is not the point? My original point was that not having MMS is not the point. Is that point not the point? =)
that's not the point, is it? even if they use such features only once a year, most people expect them to be available on a >500,- phone when they need them.
also, i don't quite understand your being so upset. the phone part on the N900 is far behind. if you don't need these missing features in a phone, be happy. but don't try to deny that they are missing
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2009-09-26
, 18:45
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#419
|
I'm also interested in what's far behind with the phone functionality on the N900. I think it's quite on par with what e.g. Android has to offer there. What are the missing parts?
| The Following User Says Thank You to pycage For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-09-26
, 18:56
|
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Tampere, Finland
|
#420
|
Someone asked earlier where or to whom Eldar works for... at least few years ago he was the lead analyst for Mobile Research Group. To my understanding this is also the biggest "connection" for him and the reason why he indeed has these prototypes and apparently pretty amazing number of devices available.
I also can't really understand why some of you had to attack so harshly against him. Some even said that they haven't even heard of him before and frankly, that tells more about the commenter than it does about Eldar. In my books he's still probably the best reviewer when it comes to phones (thanks to his connections and very thorough articles). And there's a reason why he still gets these devices even though his previews and reviews may also harm the companies (or at least the big guys like OPK might think like that).
This is just a guess but I think that Nokia has given the device to Eldar "unofficially" because he is a known player and knows the limits. By limits I mean that he knows how to maintain both the position where he can make scoops and the trust that for an example Nokia (or at least certain parts of Nokia) shows towards him.
I also can't really understand why some of you had to attack so harshly against him. Some even said that they haven't even heard of him before and frankly, that tells more about the commenter than it does about Eldar. In my books he's still probably the best reviewer when it comes to phones (thanks to his connections and very thorough articles). And there's a reason why he still gets these devices even though his previews and reviews may also harm the companies (or at least the big guys like OPK might think like that).
This is just a guess but I think that Nokia has given the device to Eldar "unofficially" because he is a known player and knows the limits. By limits I mean that he knows how to maintain both the position where he can make scoops and the trust that for an example Nokia (or at least certain parts of Nokia) shows towards him.
 |
| Tags |
| eldar, nokia n900 preview |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01.
I had higher expectations for this community.
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!