The Following User Says Thank You to PhilE For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-12-20
, 22:43
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#412
|
After getting my N900 replaced last weekend (http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=331) I've now had over 7 days without a reboot or any other problem.
I've been following the bugzilla reports for bug 6334, and it seems like some people have found a work around by adjusting the power management options in the Maemo kernel. Based on my own experience, I remain convinced that this is a hardware (i.e poor QA) rather than software problem. This is re-inforced by the fact that lots of other things on my replacement seem to work 'better' than on the first one I had.
YMMV, of course, as they used to say on Usenet...
|
2009-12-20
, 23:08
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#413
|
|
2009-12-20
, 23:37
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#414
|
So, essentially, I initiated the replacement of my rebooting device for no damn reason?
The Following User Says Thank You to bsving For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-12-21
, 13:15
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#415
|
|
2009-12-21
, 13:59
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#416
|
So what should we expect? A software release that would make our corrupted phones work as fine as those that had no reboot issues?
I'm confused. If replacing my phone allows me to get a new one, with no reboot probs and better performances, why would i wait ages for a fix that would prevent the rebooting but won't make my phone as good as others?
> Are these 32wd_to issues something that is likely to be fixed completely?
We're hoping so, for the particular issue discussed here.
Let's see after testing the current fix candinate completes.
There may still be other reasons for 32wd_to reboots which are much more rare
(may e.g. happen in all devices, but only in some specific environment which
Nokia doesn't have). Those should be filed as separate bugs.
> Will this fix render my N900 to be of equal usability regarding battery life
> etc as any other N900?
As far as I've understood, yes.
|
2009-12-21
, 14:22
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#417
|
|
2009-12-22
, 00:25
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Kirkland, WA
|
#418
|
|
2009-12-22
, 01:45
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#419
|
|
2009-12-22
, 18:19
|
Posts: 12 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Sweden
|
#420
|
Tags |
lack of quality control |
Thread Tools | |
|
I've been following the bugzilla reports for bug 6334, and it seems like some people have found a work around by adjusting the power management options in the Maemo kernel. Based on my own experience, I remain convinced that this is a hardware (i.e poor QA) rather than software problem. This is re-inforced by the fact that lots of other things on my replacement seem to work 'better' than on the first one I had.
YMMV, of course, as they used to say on Usenet...
Phil Edwards
Brighton, UK