![]() |
2010-05-08
, 04:52
|
|
Posts: 146 |
Thanked: 119 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Spain
|
#4372
|
Many people have mixed feelings about this leaked FW from a Chinese website but after testing it does appear to have given us the fix for many issues on the N900 and does NOT brick the N900.
What are your feelings about this FW? and Nokia now?.
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 05:23
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#4373
|
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 05:31
|
|
Posts: 146 |
Thanked: 119 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Spain
|
#4374
|
The moderators on this forum are proving everyday how self centred
they are. This pathetic thread is about the FUTURE OFFICIAL RELEASE SPECULATION not at all about the LEAKED FW FROM CHINA. so why was what could have been an interesting topic regarding THE ALREADY RELEASED FW FROM CHINA been merged with this pathetic thread.MODERATORS all you are in fact doing is prove to the world just how BADLY you are moderating. Maybe we should have a poll to REPLACE every moderator currently working on this forum proving to the world just how incapable they are at PROPER MODERATION TECHNIQUES.
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 06:38
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#4375
|
The moderators on this forum are proving everyday how self centred
they are. This pathetic thread is about the FUTURE OFFICIAL RELEASE SPECULATION not at all about the LEAKED FW FROM CHINA. so why was what could have been an interesting topic regarding THE ALREADY RELEASED FW FROM CHINA been merged with this pathetic thread.MODERATORS all you are in fact doing is prove to the world just how BADLY you are moderating. Maybe we should have a poll to REPLACE every moderator currently working on this forum proving to the world just how incapable they are at PROPER MODERATION TECHNIQUES.
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 06:45
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#4376
|
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 07:18
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#4377
|
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 08:57
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#4378
|
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 09:06
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ a bbq near you...
|
#4379
|
![]() |
2010-05-08
, 09:36
|
Posts: 159 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Toronto
|
#4380
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
You can only merge into an existing thread so many times before the whole thing looks like some sort of brain salad surgery prompting even more repetitive threads.
My problem is with declarative titles such as this one. Was there a study done? How large was the sample?
or should the title read:
"The [what ever] from [where ever] improved MY N900 a gazillion %. Does it do the same for you?"
SLN member # 009
Last edited by YoDude; 2010-05-08 at 04:50.