The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-29
, 05:36
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#4373
|
how crap is the android store for finding tablet optimised apps, they have a little stinky"staff picks for tablets" section but nothing proper so no way of knowing if an app is stretched to fit or optimised properly.
If anyone as any suggestions for me of good tablet apps please drop a reply in here or PM.
cheers guys
![]() |
2012-03-29
, 05:41
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#4374
|
how crap is the android store for finding tablet optimised apps, they have a little stinky"staff picks for tablets" section but nothing proper so no way of knowing if an app is stretched to fit or optimised properly.
If anyone as any suggestions for me of good tablet apps please drop a reply in here or PM.
cheers guys
![]() |
2012-04-04
, 18:50
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
|
#4375
|
And I wish the ICS navi-buttons would be permanently fixed on the screen. Sometimes your playing an app and it disappears, you want to open another app but the only way to escape is to hit the sleep and wake the device. Happened to me a couple times too much, and its annoying as fvck, it proves Android has no multitasking ability. And getting rid of the Menu button was the biggest mistake Google has made in the last 2 years, its a disaster by a design and a functionality standpoint
![]() |
2012-04-04
, 20:04
|
Posts: 79 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#4376
|
Thanks for this piece of information. I'd been debating about a Galaxy Nexus, but the lack of expandable memory was making me hesitate. The fact that I might lose the ability to easily change between applications (already one of Android's biggest drawbacks) makes it that much easier to cross the Nexus off the lists of possible choices.
![]() |
2012-04-04
, 20:36
|
Posts: 1,179 |
Thanked: 770 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#4377
|
![]() |
2012-04-04
, 21:26
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#4378
|
![]() |
2012-04-04
, 21:57
|
Posts: 241 |
Thanked: 324 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#4379
|
![]() |
2012-04-05
, 02:10
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#4380
|
User experience is Android's only flaw...can't wait for that to be sorted
![]() |
Tags |
android envy, buzz..buzz buzz, core failure, crapdroid, galaxy fap, galaxy tab, ipad killer, samsung, tab trolls, tablet envy |
Thread Tools | |
|
The same goes the other way around. Something optimized for the NOTE will be pixel-for-pixel fitted into the SG Tab, but all the ui elements would be stretched and the potential of the extra space will be wasted.
That's why Android uses a dpi solution. Problem is, the whole thing is made into one mega package (.apk) so that after its downloaded, the Android Installer chooses the right configuration. This wastes storage, internet download/server traffic and is a "messy" situation. But it works.
The reason there's a lot of problems with this is because its completely reliant on the developers to put in the effort and "re-write" their app so that it supports other dpi's. And the reason developers haven't put in the effort is easy: there's no incentive. Google needs to start placing tags (HD ?) to signify its available for tablets. And Google probably should allow the developers to create the differed dpi Apps in separate .apk's but launched them under one title. So if I searched for "Temple Run" I would only get one result, and in the information panel it would clearly show the App is available for tablets. Next part, Google Market (Play ?) should automatically detect which (dpi) version is necessary for the device you are downloading it to, and it should fetch the correct version for you...keeping the download rates smaller, less stress on the server, quicker installation, and a lot smoother experience. This makes the problem reliant on Google, meaning developers won't hesitate as much.
For iOS it doesn't matter as much, since Apple has strict regulations anyways, and the developers don't expect much flexibility. Apple has streamlined their developer kits aimed at the iPhone and iPad independently, but sharing everything in common. Apple's created a new ecosystem, and alot of incentive for developers to target the iPad. Google should copy Apple's business model in terms of this.
I'm flattered