|
2010-01-04
, 14:36
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 566 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Redstone Canyon, Colorado
|
#42
|
|
2010-01-05
, 12:42
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#43
|
|
2010-01-05
, 13:14
|
|
Posts: 516 |
Thanked: 643 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Denmark/Poland
|
#45
|
|
2010-01-05
, 14:45
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 566 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Redstone Canyon, Colorado
|
#46
|
I agree that using the autobuilder was a frustrating experience until recently (slow, packages not getting moved), but this week it has been very fast and very effective. Have you not had the same experience?
|
2010-01-05
, 14:59
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#47
|
Yes, it's definitely better than before. There's certainly still some issues though. For instance:
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5818#c27
|
2010-01-05
, 15:12
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 566 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Redstone Canyon, Colorado
|
#48
|
Autobuilder was completely fubar on the 31st-1st due to someone uploading a package that messed with it.
|
2010-01-05
, 15:41
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#49
|
Actually, that wasn't the reason. "Everyone" presumed that since debconf (or somesuch) was submitted right around the time that things broke. The explanation (more or less, mostly less) for what happened is here:
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...ry/023323.html
Need voters
grgdgrgd
Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /mnt/netapp/pear/midcom/lib/midcom/services/cache/backend.php on line 469
The Following User Says Thank You to Flandry For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-05
, 17:32
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 566 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Redstone Canyon, Colorado
|
#50
|
I just tried to promote two apps to -testing, and that particular undertaking still seems to be mostly broken. You'd think a process than only requires a maintainer to click on a link wouldn't be aggravating, right?
Also some nice errors coming out of brainstorm:
grgdgrgd? Lol the server grumbling maybe?
I mean really, a repo is just basically a webserver. I understand if someone says "wouldn't it be great if we could see buildlogs live on the build server" and it would take a month or two to implement. But a fkn webserver serving up a repo? Why should that be down so often? This is cakewalk kind of stuff. Like things that people set up by the dozen in an afternoon. Do: rsync, configure apache, dns change, done.
An SMTP server? Granted that can get a bit hairier, but sheez, not that hard. W.T.F.
This is ridiculous. I have seen that *some* progress has been made, but still...
It would be nice to actually just focus on doing what I'm doing instead of being thwarted by crappy servers all the time.
Then check out this thread where someone who actually has some access on the box defends his "turf" by basically saying more people shouldn't have access:
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...ry/023325.html
ABSURD.
-Jeff Moe
http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Jebba
http://www.lulzbot.com