Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 586 | Thanked: 471 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Finland
#41
Hi N900 user!

When i and my friend update pr1.2, our camera goes to 3M settings automatic! So change it back to 3,5M (widescreen) or 5M (4:3). Maybe this is why your picture is so bad quality.

I agree! video jammed so bad! somebody do something about that!
 
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#42
Originally Posted by 159NZ View Post
magic mushrooms from magic land full of magic or maybe there poisonous magic mushrooms...
Very nice. I've always wanted to see one of those cool red and white mushrooms. I'm not sure they grow here.

Here's one of mine. Not artistic or challenging, but it turned out nice.

Name:  20100507_001.jpg
Views: 768
Size:  40.8 KB
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ

***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful

Last edited by Flandry; 2010-06-04 at 06:19.
 
Posts: 107 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#43
For day shot, no problem.... but for night shot.... I have tried many different settings and found all night pictures are no good....

If I remove the back cover, the night picture become better.....
 
Posts: 53 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#44
Originally Posted by cmsjkung View Post
I found the camera quality is very bad on N900, for example, night shot will have many noise on the pricture, my previous 5800's camera is better a lot compare with N900.....

Hope nokia will provide upgrade make better camera picture...

Take a look at my face to face :

N86 vs N82 vs N900

http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/...howtopic=59420

N900 vs Omnia HD vs N95 8GB vs 5800XM !

http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/...howtopic=58867
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to slipkornsaad For This Useful Post:
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#45
Originally Posted by slipkornsaad View Post
Take a look at my face to face :

N86 vs N82 vs N900

http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/...howtopic=59420

N900 vs Omnia HD vs N95 8GB vs 5800XM !

http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/...howtopic=58867
Courtesy of babelfish:
"J' updated the first post with new photographs, my short opinion (without technical comments) on the 3: - N82, is always with the signal after a long time of its exit, unbeatable flash, management of l' correct exposure, but lack of clearness (can be corrected by adjustments), closer colorimetry with reality, captures subjects moving without complications! - N900, c' is l' one of the 3 which surprises me more, clear photographs, colorimetry more " plaisante" to see (lives), but the double led is too weak and has evil under the conditions with weak luminosity. - N86? Flaghship of the Nokia photophones? Can be on paper, not actually… finally… l' experiment user is poor: opening of the release --> it is necessary to have patience more than 3 seconds to have l' object on the sight!"

LOL @ "double LED has evil under the conditions with weak luminosity." Couldn't have said it better myself...

I'd say looking through those that the N900 is tied for the lead except whenever the evil flash comes on.
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ

***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful
 
Posts: 214 | Thanked: 256 times | Joined on May 2010
#46
Originally Posted by cmsjkung View Post
As you can see the following picture, then you know how bad it really is....

MEN THATS AWFUL! My N900 doesn't not take pictures that bad!!

I think something is wrong with your device because since I have my N900 I don't need a camera and almost all my pictures are at night because I like to go to clasic concerts at night.
 
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,530 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#47
for Video, use the internal eMMC for storage otherwise your video will get frames lag and also stuttering often. WIth internal eMMC you get less stuttering.
 
Posts: 424 | Thanked: 196 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sweden
#48
As long as you can stay to ISO 100 and 200 and good light. Then you will get very nice result.
But with bad lightsource you can use the flash but then take the pictures quite close to the object for the flash to reach. Its pointles to try to picture a whole room.
And its better with a little darker picture with ISO 100 then a granular and brighter with ISO 400.
Sometimes you have to force the camera to use a certain white balance because the automatic mode have dificultis to dermite what to use. And in some cases Exposure could help, but it not much.

Here is some good pictures in good light.
Attached Images
    
 
breakd0wn's Avatar
Posts: 96 | Thanked: 35 times | Joined on May 2010
#49
Originally Posted by slipkornsaad View Post
Take a look at my face to face :

N86 vs N82 vs N900

http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/...howtopic=59420
This was very interesting. I have owned all 3 of these phones. But not at the same time, so never made a comparison.

I was really looking at the n86 vs the n900 in day shots here, and looks like the n900 had better looking pictures. More natural colors, and the n86 always had a blue tinge to all the pictures (much like the n82 has a yellowish).

Unfortunately those are all downsized, so can't look at the detail blown up, but would expect the n86 to have better detail due to more mp. But the n900 had better pictures.

And also the n86 is better in low light with and without a flash. As long as you set it on a timer, we all know the shutter button on the n86 horrible and you will never get a steady shot by pressing it.

The bottom line is the n900 is a decent camera. But the flash sucks, never use it. Unless you're in a pitch black room and think you see an alien, and its either a horrible picture with a blue tint, or nothing at all, then its ok to use the flash. But never expect a picture that the flash was used to look good from the n900. Other than that, steady hand, the more light the better, and play with the settings.
 
Posts: 61 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#50
Makeclick thanks but it'a already at 3.5.

I have heard that if you change or remove (or I don't know what else) the cover of the lens then this makes the photos to look better.Is this right or false info?
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23.