![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:21
|
Posts: 244 |
Thanked: 155 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ DC
|
#42
|
Some high end users may want no keyboard, some may want one. Some business users may want none, bb-style, or n97-style. Same for mid range.
I'm glad they offer so many options, and it seems like they're working to keep the internals as similar as possible.
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:33
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#43
|
I don't know why Nokia needs 16 different models. It's harder to support and more difficult to manage internally. I think part of the reason the iPhone is so polished is because that is the only phone Apple works on. Not 16 different iterations of the almost the same thing.
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:41
|
Posts: 244 |
Thanked: 155 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ DC
|
#44
|
having more models is one of the reasons why nokia has more customers, too. if you don't want a touch screen or need a hardware qwerty keyboard - what does apple have for you?
The Following User Says Thank You to sevla For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:49
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#45
|
LIke i said.. I'm all for options and I suggested having keyboard vs non keyboard options.
But do we really need 7 different c class phones??
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:52
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#46
|
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:56
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#47
|
The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:57
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#48
|
LIke i said.. I'm all for options and I suggested having keyboard vs non keyboard options.
But do we really need 7 different c class phones??
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 15:57
|
Posts: 174 |
Thanked: 69 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#49
|
The Following User Says Thank You to zfarooq For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-09
, 16:00
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#50
|
Quite the opposite imo. The more the (MeeGo) devices, the more the adoption of MeeGo will be. And this will drive more developers to the platform and directly/indirectly lead to a vast (and perhaps quality) Application library.
The fact that Qt & Linux can be served in such a cross-platform solution will only multiply that.
For once I see that Apple is actually playing catch-up in its own field. I mean Apple started the smartphone revolution but HTC expanded it with the G1 and Nexus One. So the best chance for MeeGo is today and if it could serve killer hardware, great software integration, include tasty functions (from desktop os linage) and show promise by releasing a tablet (its the craze) with 1:1 App compatibility with the phone device.
These are all possible, perhaps even easy with the tools (Qt), that needs to be available now. As soon as Froyo arrives, iPhone 4 released and the Google tablet is released, things are going to look more obsolete for MeeGo.
No hardware QWERTY and offer me the same virtual keyboard the N900 has? I'd be very incensed.