![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:11
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#42
|
there are more than one thing that dual core ARM doing better than single core.
* 1080p encoding and decoding without consuming all the cpu cycles
* Multitasking will be smooth and less time to do tasks
* gaming will be on a different level
* smoother GUI transitions
* better batter usage (in theory, two horses can climb steeper hill than one horse)
* May need OS optimisations to make good use of the muscle. ( for crying out loud, android Honeycom didn't even have dual core support and yet there are devices released with dual cores for it)
Please don't compare a DSLR to a mobile camera. it's like you are comparing a DSLR to Hubble telescope. Two on different class of devices. DSLR has the optical capability but mbile is fixed lense. Comparing Qualcomm to Cortex is like AMD to Intel. We've seen the war before and both archetectures are similar just different approach.
if N9 doesn't have atleast dual core A9 + 1GB RAM then I don't think Nokia will ever compete in the fast growing mobile era. Also having 12MP camera is a bonus when recording video in high resolution and densing the pixel to 1080p is better than 5mp, eg. N8 took great videos quality.
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:14
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#43
|
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:15
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#44
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:19
|
Posts: 209 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ York, Pa., USA
|
#45
|
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:22
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#46
|
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:22
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#47
|
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:26
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#48
|
if meego is dead? (still not sure if this is true) does that mean N900 gets Hartman? (Why waste the code?)
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:31
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#49
|
I keep coming back to these threads in case something significant as been found and posted which i would hate to miss, and all i end up doing is giving myself a headache
![]() |
2011-01-24
, 19:32
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#50
|
If you meant my comment I was actually joking. (I hope..................................... :-/
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
cia debunked, its true, n9 is a myth, no kia, scifi, top secret |
Thread Tools | |
|
= different manufactors, different ways the CPU works.
Same goes for dualcore vs singelcore. If the OS isn't optimized for dualcore maybe singlecore infact is faster.
Also what I meant was even if the CPU SUPPORTS xxx feature it doesnt always means the core OS is ready to support it but still people beleive it cause the "specs" says soo.