![]() |
2009-08-31
, 18:32
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#522
|
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 18:34
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#523
|
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 18:36
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#524
|
I wouldn't bet on 'not much' here. Regarding the target demographic you mentioned, Texrat, wouldn't that basically (also) be a similar market to that of those who purchased an iphone? Not necessarily cheap on purchase, but heavy on monthly fees because of a data plan? And weren't those the same people who nagged about sms for a full year and a half, so much that they had to eventually put it there in the end? Shouldn't Nokia have learned from that?
I honestly don't use mms as a rule of thumb, but I end up using it from time to time because of other people's phones not being able to get e-mail. The problem is not necessarily that we don't have a feature that a R$30 phone has. I get the paradigm change. The problem is not being able to send a picture to that R$30 phone, cause it won't have any other way of getting it. That's what nags users, including (IMHO) those who purchase the N900. To have a phone that does wonders, but doesn't handle the simple. Kinda agree that it should be available on launch, even if not technically justifiable. It's not about 'technically justifiable', I believe. It's about people's perspective on it.
At least that's what it seems to me to be happening here.
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 18:40
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#525
|
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 18:46
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#526
|
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 19:15
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#527
|
The Following User Says Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 19:29
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#528
|
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 19:30
|
|
Posts: 283 |
Thanked: 31 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ US Air Force
|
#529
|
Objection, Your Honor! Assumptions!
Objection! "Good to know" expresses bias and a negative attitude. (And as a personal remark, based on what I've seen... the opposite would be "good to know" for me)
![]() |
2009-08-31
, 20:47
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 50 times |
Joined on Oct 2006
|
#530
|
![]() |
Tags |
fremantle, maemo, n900 |
Thread Tools | |
|
I honestly don't use mms as a rule of thumb, but I end up using it from time to time because of other people's phones not being able to get e-mail. The problem is not necessarily that we don't have a feature that a R$30 phone has. I get the paradigm change. The problem is not being able to send a picture to that R$30 phone, cause it won't have any other way of getting it. That's what nags users, including (IMHO) those who purchase the N900. To have a phone that does wonders, but doesn't handle the simple. Kinda agree that it should be available on launch, even if not technically justifiable. It's not about 'technically justifiable', I believe. It's about people's perspective on it.
At least that's what it seems to me to be happening here.