|
2011-05-16
, 19:43
|
|
Posts: 597 |
Thanked: 490 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#582
|
A couple of users already reported problems with bluetooth after upgrading to powerv47, but never got a response.
I am using updated openobex/obexd from this thread (also see wiki) for accessing N900 from my carkit.
Connecting to my carkit and dialling is still working, but the other day I noticed that sound is not transmitted anymore.
I am pretty sure this was introduced by powerv47.
Can someone please confirm that v47 includes some bluetooth related changes and what?
Maybe the relevant information will help the devs of obexd creating a new version that works with v47!?
The Following User Says Thank You to Reflektorfalke For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-16
, 21:21
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#583
|
|
2011-05-16
, 21:31
|
|
Posts: 597 |
Thanked: 490 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#584
|
Thats important info, but are You sure that absolutely nothing changed on your N900, i.e no updates etc? That would be really strange, if happen out of nothing.
|
2011-05-16
, 21:43
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,960 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#585
|
|
2011-05-16
, 21:52
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Trinidad and Tobago
|
#586
|
|
2011-05-16
, 22:03
|
|
Posts: 597 |
Thanked: 490 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#587
|
I am dealing with SW development for at least 20 years and trust me, there is no such thing like "strange one-time event". There are reasons why you have had a problem and there are reasons why you don't have it anymore. Just do you best to find them (if possible), it will help a lot.
|
2011-05-16
, 22:24
|
|
Posts: 597 |
Thanked: 490 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#588
|
|
2011-05-17
, 01:18
|
Posts: 27 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#589
|
It's actually an issue with gstreamer0.10-av, which was depended on by the new ogg-support.
And it was fixed days ago, so no need to revert.
And all this was already covered in this thread that everybody likes to post in, but nobody can be bothered to read.
|
2011-05-17
, 05:36
|
Posts: 262 |
Thanked: 315 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#590
|
Tags |
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou |
Thread Tools | |
|
Flandry - this way You're right, of course. But please, don't do measurements (and don't recommend others to) of battery drain by using battery-eye. Battery-eye, using standard bme guessing methods, just... Well, guess - when we talk about battery charge percentage. Only info that may be useful from applications like that is Voltage - mAh, percentage of charge etc are just estimated values.
Even worse, this like to turn into total mess when You switch heavy/low usuage many times during one cycle, then, on another - for example - use only low use or only high use. For me, Battery-eye show under-zero capacity 1-2 hours before real discharge almost 100% times. Not to mention how it goes crazy when You replace battery with new one, or - scary word - hotswap it
Only one exception from that may be dr_frost mAH graph, tied strictly with voltage - but even voltage can fluctuate highly on power-cycle (yea, after turning off/on you can have higher voltage for even quite long time), so measurement by that way can show You that powercycle charge Your battery On the other hand, programs like battery-eye use some build-in artificial handling of powercycles - when you do it, it mandatory shows huge capacity drop, so, as i mentioned in other thread, You can do 50 power cycles, then use Your N900 for another day with -70 capacity all the time
Last edited by Estel; 2011-05-16 at 21:20.