Reply
Thread Tools
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 42 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#51
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
This is fine... then why did we need to make even more? and more? and make it more a convoluted mess with more loopholes than already exist??
I tend to agree with you on this one. People should use more common sense and moral thinking than relying on bloated laws that only exist to prevent the next kid getting killed while doing 50 over the speed limit.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#52
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
This is fine... then why did we need to make even more? and more? and make it more a convoluted mess with more loopholes than already exist??
I agree in principle with Laughing Man but add the caveat that "reckless driving" in and of itself is very vague and apparently difficult to prosecute. I know of dozens and dozens of people who have received tickets for all sorts of quantifiable reasons and not one who has received a reckless driving ticket-- despite knowing many who deserve it.

Texting is, however, easily quantifiable. Yes, I'll grant you the prosecutorial hurdles... but if representatives of the law decide they need an example or two, well...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#53
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I agree in principle with Laughing Man but add the caveat that "reckless driving" in and of itself is very vague and apparently difficult to prosecute. I know of dozens and dozens of people who have received tickets for all sorts of quantifiable reasons and not one who has received a reckless driving ticket-- despite knowing many who deserve it.
I know quite a few people that have received a reckless driving ticket. Whether they deserved it or not is up for question.. most of the time it had to do with speed though. If you drive more than X over the speed limit it's a reck-driving ticket and not a speeding ticket.

Texting is, however, easily quantifiable. Yes, I'll grant you the prosecutorial hurdles... but if representatives of the law decide they need an example or two, well...
And this.. entire idea.. just scares the hell out of me. "Making Examples" of people just leads to bad juju.
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#54
Actually.. wait... as I just re-read your thing Tex: You start by saying, "I agree in principal, but it's hard to prosecute." And then end with, "I agree prosecuting sucks, but.." (paraphrased)

So... both the law you think is inefficient, AND the law you're supporting.. have the same flaw? Help me out here..
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#55
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
And this.. entire idea.. just scares the hell out of me. "Making Examples" of people just leads to bad juju.
And yet, if you pare our justice system down, you'll find that concept is the real core.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#56
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
Actually.. wait... as I just re-read your thing Tex: You start by saying, "I agree in principal, but it's hard to prosecute." And then end with, "I agree prosecuting sucks, but.." (paraphrased)

So... both the law you think is inefficient, AND the law you're supporting.. have the same flaw? Help me out here..
That isn't what I said. Read again please.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#57
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
And yet, if you pare our justice system down, you'll find that concept is the real core.
And with this.. we are at an impasse. I have no further argument as we have ended at the same agreement...

It's just - you appear to accept this reality, and I abhor it. This is not the way things should be done. Do I have a better way? No, not really... Just with how much of an epic fail this one is.. I know there has to be one.
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#58
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
That isn't what I said. Read again please.
Hrm.. I guess I'm missing something. I'm certainly not saying you presented it wrong - but I'm not seeing it. Since paraphrasing didnt work.. your exact quotes:

"reckless driving" in and of itself is very vague and apparently difficult to prosecute. "

Followed immediately by..

"Yes, I'll grant you the prosecutorial hurdles..."

These two statements sound very much like a "TomAto, TomOto" phrase. The only clarification you add is that you think Texting is more quantifiable than Reckless Driving... but if we were to break every possible way for someone to swerve in their car incorrectly and make laws against it... well..

I think even you would agree thats a bit silly. How long before "changing radio stations" becomes illegal? And yes, this has killed kids.
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#59
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
And with this.. we are at an impasse. I have no further argument as we have ended at the same agreement...

It's just - you appear to accept this reality, and I abhor it. This is not the way things should be done. Do I have a better way? No, not really... Just with how much of an epic fail this one is.. I know there has to be one.
I fell into this reality where no perfect solution exists for anything-- just some solutions that are less imperfect than others.

Social animals will always find themselves in the middle of this Push-me-pull-you reality and the best we can do is use our whips/voices/votes to drive away from greater evil and toward greater good. It's a constant struggle, and the rules change beneath our feet.

Which just exposes the greatest irony of all, in that many individuals want their individual liberties protected-- by, of all things, a society that tends to gleefully [and stupidly] cede its collective liberties for the perception of security.

Least worst solution: move to desert island.

__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2009-12-22 at 20:53.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#60
I wish I could.

But I'm the the freedom-loving crazy gun-nut that owns an AR-15 and stockpiles food waiting for the Zombie-pacalypse that the government tried to reclassify as "terrorist" with that Homeland security document.

So I'm probably a bad example...

As for your acceptance of no perfect solution, it really disappoints me Tex. Just because we can agree no perfect solution exists (there will always be the Human factor)... that shouldn't mean we cease to try and "better" the ineffectual solution in place. There just.. isn't really a "brainstorm" for real life that politicians really care about. The brainstorm in the real life is a politician putting up a solution - and then bribing or lying to everyone to give them a thumbs up till it passes.
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:14.