pharaoh92
|
2010-11-03
, 20:28
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#51
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pharaoh92 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-04
, 19:04
|
Posts: 436 |
Thanked: 406 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#52
|
|
2010-11-07
, 00:17
|
Posts: 436 |
Thanked: 406 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#53
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SavageD For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-08
, 06:08
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#55
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mart5.1 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-08
, 15:23
|
Posts: 436 |
Thanked: 406 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#56
|
To SavageD
"Please if you have tried the patches and notice any difference in the n900, good or bad, provide some feed back."
I have been using option #1 for three days now and have noticed that the sound is much better than the stock settings on pr1.3. The bass is much better and although stereo widening is set to false the sound is more expansive and the volume is louder. I have experienced no problems when using your patch.
One question, I read somewhere in the forums (can't find it now) that some poster had a command to make changes to alsamixer permanent, could we use something like that to keep the capture volume at zero?
Please keep up the great work on the n900 sound quality, thanks once again
The Following User Says Thank You to SavageD For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-08
, 16:48
|
Posts: 140 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#57
|
i have installed and used option 2, will update tomorrow, but the volume ie my ring tone volume went up quite a bit
The Following User Says Thank You to bobbydoedoe For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-10
, 15:14
|
Posts: 436 |
Thanked: 406 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#59
|
|
2010-11-11
, 00:12
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#60
|