|
2011-02-13
, 02:11
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#52
|
If you recruit a top manager from MS it's obvious that he has loads of shares, not even a question whether he has those. Common policy is to sell those when leaving to new position.
I've been trying to say many times in this thread that he managed to sell 60% of his shares, but right after he joined Nokia, he was registered as MS insider. He had to stop selling. This is what Nokia has told today. Now that big strategic changes have been published, he can continue selling. It could have been handled better, but making some conspiracy theories (not blaming you here) is just plain stupid.
|
2011-02-13
, 03:16
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#53
|
|
2011-02-13
, 04:06
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#54
|
My main interest is I bought some devices from Nokia (N800, N810 and N900) and want to continue buying similar devices. Besides that, I don't care if Nokia goes down the tubes or becomes Queen of the May.
|
2011-02-13
, 05:50
|
|
Posts: 963 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Connecticut, USA
|
#55
|
I guess what it comes down to is, out of the whole market, Nokia is the only company with a record of being able and willing to deliver the mobile devices that most meets our needs and wants (why else would we be here?). As it stands today, if Nokia is no longer willing to do that, there aren't really any viable alternatives.
Frankly, as sad as it sounds, I'm having trouble coping with the idea of a mobile future where there isn't a single manufacturer seeking to meet my needs as a consumer. I've invested nearly 6 years of my time and energy into the Nokia open source endeavor once called Maemo and seeing it tossed aside for MeeGo was hard enough, but now seeing all hope of a friendly open source future in mobile technology now set back by years (or destroyed) . . . well, it hurts.
It's only logical that people would seek explain the how and the why of such a world-shaking decision. It wouldn't be so bad if we had choices, but, without Nokia, we really don't.
|
2011-02-13
, 09:39
|
|
Posts: 1,111 |
Thanked: 1,985 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Åbo, Finland
|
#58
|
|
2011-02-13
, 10:35
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#59
|
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-13
, 11:12
|
Posts: 84 |
Thanked: 121 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#60
|
Why are there so many people on this site so interested in Nokia's proper business strategy and apparently so uninterested in things like maemo.org or even internettablettalk?
My main interest is I bought some devices from Nokia (N800, N810 and N900) and want to continue buying similar devices. Besides that, I don't care if Nokia goes down the tubes or becomes Queen of the May.
Tags |
crybabies, elop rapes dogs, kajko is elop's, lover. cute., w32.elop.trojan |
Thread Tools | |
|
http://www.dailyfinance.com/company/...onal-ownership
As I said previously, I don't believe it's these shares that have dictated the bend-over in front of Microsoft. But the link fron this post does make me wonder...
In anticipation of TMO's obsolescence, and hoping to meet you all again: elsewhere on the interwebs, I am Dr Doppio.