jellyroll
|
2016-02-17
, 20:04
|
|
Posts: 435 |
Thanked: 684 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Netherlands 020
|
#51
|
|
2016-02-17
, 20:19
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#52
|
I've tried to give you an answer in every single reply. Every time you've ignored me, not addressed any of it, and moaned that I'm not answering you again in a really grumpy, condescending way, and I'm getting really tired of it.
Please tell me which parts you're having trouble with.
Again, it's not that they need to jailbreak it.
|
2016-02-17
, 20:37
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 1,460 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#53
|
The Following User Says Thank You to billranton For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-17
, 20:51
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#54
|
- 'Appliance' OSes guard components from their users.
- Users get around this by putting together jailbreaking packages to remove these restrictions
- BB10 has jailbreaking packages available
- Therefore we can assume that it has these restrictions
- And someone felt the need to circumvent them to do what they wanted to do.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-17
, 21:03
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 1,460 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#55
|
|
2016-02-17
, 21:41
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#56
|
Brilliant ta. Circumventing managed obsolescence is a really common reason. Do you think it'll be more necessary if they abandon BB10, to apply security updates to OSS components that they may no longer maintain?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-17
, 22:48
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 1,460 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#57
|
No clue.
So far there's 10.3.3 planned, it seems to be security oriented. Due to QNX being used elsewhere (auto industry mostly) my hope is that BlackBerry still will update and enable security updates for BB10 OS as necessary.
Otherwise, it will be another handset that had an OS that I liked dropped all too soon. First Maemo, then MeeGo. Now BB10?
|
2016-02-18
, 00:03
|
|
Posts: 3,141 |
Thanked: 8,161 times |
Joined on Feb 2013
@ From my Gabriola Island hermitage, near the Edge of the World
|
#58
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to endsormeans For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-18
, 02:04
|
Posts: 671 |
Thanked: 1,630 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#59
|
Of course I was being a little facetious, and seem to have enraged a fair few people
I would say that QNX/BB10 is a fine operating system at its core with a great pedigree, but that the distribution offered to Blackberry users is hobbled to the point where I would rate it as equivalent to a console OS.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to theonelaw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-18
, 07:42
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 1,460 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#60
|
"...anger and disappointment on this forum..." ?
It isn't in existence elsewhere on the forums until the mention of competitors springs up...
(currently this poor behaviour is isolated predominantly in the Jolla subforums..)
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to billranton For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
sailfish os |
Thread Tools | |
|