|
2010-02-19
, 18:25
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#652
|
|
2010-02-19
, 18:29
|
Posts: 184 |
Thanked: 49 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ US
|
#653
|
|
2010-02-19
, 18:29
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#654
|
That has already happened and been reported numerous times in this thread (and on my blog).
|
2010-02-19
, 18:30
|
Posts: 1,283 |
Thanked: 370 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ South Florida
|
#655
|
I am sorry (and I have mentioned this before.
But I am not willing to have faith in this until I hear from people with "Landing pad damage" that they have had nokia repair or replace the phone.
I know I sound overly pesemistic. But I do think I have reason.
As for the timeline. As i mentioned after MarkS quoted the policy on engadget the centre I went to recieved an update the very next morning.
The update was not what we wanted to hear. But if the new announcement a few days ago is what we expect. Then no one with pad damage should be getting a phone returned from Nokia care centers if it was looked at after thursday just gone.
Lets watch this for a few more days and see what happens .
But we should be seeing people with pad damaged phones getting them returned early next week. Then I will bew willing to give Nokia credit for doing the right thing.
|
2010-02-19
, 18:35
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#656
|
Pad damage?
I have seen reports of people getting Warranty repair. But that has been the case from the start. I had assumed that was solder joint damage as was mentioned as repairable by the centre I took my phone into.
I have not yet seen anyone claim their phone had pad damage. Or have in the past had it rejected due to this (BER) that has now had it fixed.
As I say it might take a little more time. While these people return the phone for a second round.
Or I may not have noticed someone who has posted before claiming it was refused as (BER) then post stating it is now fixed.
Please let me know I am wrong about that ?
|
2010-02-19
, 18:36
|
Posts: 170 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ NYC
|
#657
|
My feeling is that this is a potential issue with 100% of the phones.
|
2010-02-19
, 18:37
|
Posts: 184 |
Thanked: 49 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ US
|
#658
|
|
2010-02-19
, 18:40
|
Posts: 1,283 |
Thanked: 370 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ South Florida
|
#659
|
Yes, that has been my cry since I saw this thread. Even if the phones were to get replaced, the new ones will break lose in another month or two and after that? Unless Nokia takes a giant step and fixes this can of worms, this will be a big shot in groin for them.
I am still under the return window with amazon.com. Although logic tells me I should return the device, my heart tells me I want it. damn!
|
2010-02-19
, 18:47
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#660
|
Every case of detached USB connector that I have seen described included some degree of pad damage.
That is THE mode of failure here: pads coming free of the PCB surface as I have described numerous times.
It isn't a soldering failure at all. That's unlikely enough to almost be impossible.
I'm not understanding where the confusion is originating...
Tags |
bad design, broken, charging, failure, hardware, loose, microusb, microusb port, n900, nokia, part, port, repair, return, surface mount, usb, usb port, warranty |
Thread Tools | |
|
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net