Jolla Tablet Refunds (latest developments) - Page 68 - maemo.org

Active Topics

The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 20 hrs, 51 mins ago
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 6 days, 9 hrs ago
more...

Page 68 of 615

Thread Tools

	Copernicus	2015-08-12 , 14:17
	Posts: 1,986 \| Thanked: 7,698 times \| Joined on Dec 2010 @ Dayton, Ohio	#671

Originally Posted by mosen

Tabletmonkeys.com posted the or better "a" User Manual.

Wow, I really hope they get a chance to run that user manual past a native English speaker before they start sending out the tablets...

	mosen	2015-08-12 , 14:24
	Community Council \| Posts: 1,669 \| Thanked: 10,225 times \| Joined on Nov 2014 @ Lower Rhine	#672

Tabletmonkeys seem to have messed up and posted the manual of a chinese mockup according to comments on FB. Lets see how this developes...

	mrsellout	2015-08-12 , 15:20
	Posts: 889 \| Thanked: 2,087 times \| Joined on Sep 2010 @ Manchester	#673

The screenshots in the pdf are from an Android device. I wonder if the ODM is also releasing the tablet with Android pre-installed.

	mosen	2015-08-12 , 15:30
	Community Council \| Posts: 1,669 \| Thanked: 10,225 times \| Joined on Nov 2014 @ Lower Rhine	#674

Ok, the article is a whole lot of crap... sorry if i sparked expectations or mislead someone. Seems like Tabletmonkeys made up most of that article from googling after the FCC ID and JT-1501...

mscion	2015-08-12 , 18:01
Posts: 1,873 \| Thanked: 4,529 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ North Potomac MD	#675

Originally Posted by mosen

Ok, the article is a whole lot of crap... sorry if i sparked expectations or mislead someone. Seems like Tabletmonkeys made up most of that article from googling after the FCC ID and JT-1501...

I hope you are correct! The article says that the Jolla Tablet (JT-1501) is a Android based tablet with Sailfish OS on top of that! Ouch!

	peterleinchen	2015-08-12 , 19:17
	Posts: 4,118 \| Thanked: 8,901 times \| Joined on Aug 2010 @ Ruhrgebiet, Germany	#676

Funny is also the FCC part with the SAR value of 1.6, so it should have not been to hard to fulfill Dave999's need for 3G

__________________
SIM-Switcher, automated SIM switching with a Double (Dual) SIM adapter
--
Thank you all for voting me into the Community Council 2014-2016!

Please consider your membership / supporting Maemo e.V. and help to spread this by following/copying this link to your TMO signature:
[MC eV] Maemo Community eV membership application, http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=94257

editsignature, http://talk.maemo.org/profile.php?do=editsignature

bluefoot	2015-08-12 , 19:44
Posts: 338 \| Thanked: 496 times \| Joined on Oct 2010	#677

I have to say I find it very disappointing that Jolla made the recipients of developer devices sign an NDA for the software as well as the hardware.

Again, everything behind closed doors with not even a semblance of openess.

The hardware I understand, as the device still isn't on sale, but SF2.0? It's already months past original launch window ... if they'd shipped developer units immediately after MWC in Barcelona, there may have been some case for it. Now? Is it really so far off production ready with less than a month left until the (significantly delayed) launch that they need to throw a rug over it?

Need I mention again that they still haven't produced any significant video (or stills) of SF2.0 ... the most we've seen of it is still handheld JerkyCam(TM) video of it at the beginning of March, 5 months ago. The PR launch video they showed a few weeks ago showed less than the original Indiegogo concept videos / sketches.

Last edited by bluefoot; 2015-08-12 at 19:49.

	Copernicus	2015-08-12 , 19:53
	Posts: 1,986 \| Thanked: 7,698 times \| Joined on Dec 2010 @ Dayton, Ohio	#678

Originally Posted by bluefoot

I have to say I find it very disappointing that Jolla made the developers sign an NDA for the software as well as the hardware.

Are you crazy???

Mosen just posted a link to a site that got some weird pre-production version of the tablet, and they totally panned it. It'd be even worse if they received a valid pre-production version of the tablet. People take one look at these reviews, form a lasting impression of the product, and walk away never to return.

If you want to document your development process, that's great. But if you want to market a successful product in the modern world, you don't let anyone actually see it until after you've created a polished, relatively bug-free version.

EDIT: Ok, yeah, you're talking about the software here. My bad.

But still, I give Jolla a pass here, as they've kind of tied Sailfish 2.0 and the tablet together, so I would imagine they want to increase the impact by releasing both together...