|
2008-12-10
, 13:04
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#62
|
|
2008-12-10
, 13:43
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#63
|
keyboard similar to N810 one + 5 buttons (mapped to F6-F10) + camera buttons (shutter, focus)
escape sends normal key code for escape key and d-pad sends up/down/left/right/enter so is should be OK, what surprised me is that current tablets map those buttons to F4-F8
|
2008-12-10
, 14:14
|
|
Posts: 600 |
Thanked: 742 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ England
|
#64
|
On a touch screen the critical value is the physical size of the screen.
The Following User Says Thank You to eiffel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-12-10
, 14:30
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#65
|
|
2008-12-10
, 16:09
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#66
|
I've got two cameras of nearly the same model, the only difference is that one is 6 megapixels and the other 8 (IIRC).. everything else is the same. Most importantly, the CCD is the same size, so the 8MP version has smaller pixels.
The result? Smaller pixels: Smaller light-collecting area. Less photons: the light sensitivity went out the window. The 'new' higher-pixel model is close to useless compared to the earlier model, as the 6MP version works just fine in twilight while it's difficult to even focus in indoor lightning or cloudy afternoon with the 8MP version. And, as the new model compensates for less light sensitivity by slowing down the shutter I get much shakier images.
No, give me max. 6-7MP any day, the pixel mania only results in bigger pictures for no reason, and less light sensitivity. At least for compact cameras. The best SLR cameras (with large CCDs too) can afford many megapixels, but I wish they could leave the compact cameras (and by extension, phone cameras) out of this *****ic race. Heck, it's quite impossible to buy anything below 10MP these days - I've tried. Argh..
|
2008-12-10
, 18:25
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#68
|
|
2008-12-10
, 18:38
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#69
|
Still would like 1000x600 screen: more useful in not-fullscreen; desktop apps should fit gracefully.
About 5Mpx camera: it is even too big. Quality from N9x isn't breathtaking. To reduce Bayer effects you have to resize 50% getting 1.25Mpx in effect. Would preffer *real* 3Mpx any day.
But then, I am actually ridiculed by some friends and family for having a large (ie, writer's) vocabulary.
|
2008-12-10
, 18:42
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Philadelphia, PA
|
#70
|
Tags |
fremantle, iphone killer, n900, rover, rx-51 |
Thread Tools | |
|
iirc, a company tried to move away from reporting megapixels, and had their sales drop like a rock.
megapixels have become what hertz is to a cpu, a measuring stick for those that want to think they are in the know when buying of the shelf goods at some local store.