Reply
Thread Tools
mikec's Avatar
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#61
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
Unfortunately, this topic is not going to go anywhere on this forum. The fanboy's don't even want to admit that the N900 could be considered 'thick' lol.
Thick is relative.

I have not yet heard any evidence based reasoning on the implication that Nokia did NOT do as good a job as they could have done, other than comparisons with other devices that seem to have similar capability, which on closer inspection are not similar at all.

Don't get me wrong, I would love the N900 to be more pocketable. But NOT if its at the expense of the great features it has, features where YMMV.

Mike C
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mikec For This Useful Post:
Posts: 100 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#62
I feel no one has complained about the size yet because it's hard to get a real feel without holding the real thing. Besides, videos dont give a good idea of the true thickness of the device. 19mm is always 2 cm, which is pretty damn thick.

I'm just a bit worried if the device is going to come off looking awkward because of the thickness. I sort of want this phone to become my everyday device too, but I'm afraid the device will bulge out a lot from my work pants or evening go-out jeans.
 
mikec's Avatar
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#63
If you want to put this into perspective.

N95 8gb is 99x55x21mm
N900 is 110x59.8x18(19.55)mm
My Wallet is 110x85x30mm

Both the N95 and Wallet have been in my jeans for a number of years.

Mike C

Last edited by mikec; 2009-11-01 at 14:37.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mikec For This Useful Post:
Posts: 96 | Thanked: 23 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Sweden
#64
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
Unfortunately, this topic is not going to go anywhere on this forum. The fanboy's don't even want to admit that the N900 could be considered 'thick' lol.
it is funny how "one eyed" people can get when they are a "fan" of something.
__________________
Will the N900 be the loooooooong awaited replacement for my old N95 1st Gen ?
 
Posts: 96 | Thanked: 23 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Sweden
#65
Originally Posted by mikec View Post
I

Both the N95 and Wallet have been in my jeans for a number of years.

Mike C
Could not resist:
Mike you must only have HARD CASH, as you compare a leather wallet to a phone
__________________
Will the N900 be the loooooooong awaited replacement for my old N95 1st Gen ?
 
Posts: 521 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#66
Originally Posted by mikec View Post
If you want to put this into perspective.

N95 8gb is 99x55x21mm
N900 is 110x59.8x18(19.55)mm
My Wallet is 110x85x30mm

Both the N95 and Wallet have been in my jeans for a number of years.

Mike C
I also had the n95 in my pocket for a year, it was just bearable. The n900 (180g) is also 50% heavier than the n95 (120g) which makes a big difference too. I also have an E71 and then realized just how thick the n95 really was.

I have held the n900 in the store, in the year 2009 it is thick and the weight doesn't help. I'm willing to put up with the thickness because of the features but I'm sure many other people will not.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to bugelrex For This Useful Post:
mikec's Avatar
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#67
Originally Posted by McChicken View Post
Could not resist:
Mike you must only have HARD CASH, as you compare a leather wallet to a phone
McChicken does the bulge my wallet makes, make me more attractive

by the way how on earth did you choose a screen name like Mc Chicken .....or should I not ask?
 
Posts: 946 | Thanked: 1,650 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#68
Originally Posted by McChicken View Post
it is funny how "one eyed" people can get when they are a "fan" of something.
I'm sure they would also love that neat Nokia 900 phone:
;-)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to titan For This Useful Post:
mikec's Avatar
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#69
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
I also had the n95 in my pocket for a year, it was just bearable. The n900 (180g) is also 50% heavier than the n95 (120g) which makes a big difference too. I also have an E71 and then realized just how thick the n95 really was.

I have held the n900 in the store, in the year 2009 it is thick and the weight doesn't help. I'm willing to put up with the thickness because of the features but I'm sure many other people will not.
I'm sure we all want it smaller and lighter, but then my ipod, my camera, my E71, my tomtom and all the accompanying cables and chargers will all get left out of the bag/coat/belt clip when the N900 arrives. So for me the width seems small YMMV.

Mike C
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikec For This Useful Post:
Posts: 521 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#70
Originally Posted by mikec View Post
I'm sure we all want it smaller and lighter, but then my ipod, my camera, my E71, my tomtom and all the accompanying cables and chargers will all get left out of the bag/coat/belt clip when the N900 arrives. So for me the width seems small YMMV.

Mike C
I think the first few months you'll still be carrying some of those extra items:
- camera. Need for decent night/flash shots
- tomtom. OVI maps is no where near capable. Read this experience from a Maemo developer

http://mer-l-in.blogspot.com/2009/10...we-can-do.html

- might need to carry an extra battery. Hard to say at the moment
 

The Following User Says Thank You to bugelrex For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:26.