pabs3
|
2011-06-21
, 09:24
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
|
#7011
|
|
2011-06-21
, 09:27
|
Posts: 835 |
Thanked: 772 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Finland
|
#7012
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kozzi For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-21
, 09:30
|
Posts: 341 |
Thanked: 607 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#7013
|
About your list, though. Can you please tell me why the no front-facing buttons thing is being advertised as something new and cool? (the N900 doesn't have them either...)?
Because the only reason I can think of, is that the iPhone DOES have a button on the screen. And judging by availability markets for the N9, I can't help but conclude there was only one thing Nokia was thinking about when designing this phone: the iPhone 4. And global markets where the iPhone hasn't taken the biggest share of smartphones yet.
And I highly doubt your list could go on and on....
I just didn't want an iPhone replacement, but an N900 replacement. And if Nokia is about to abandon this ecosystem (you know it will), I don't know why they didn't do it the N900 way. Sorry.
|
2011-06-21
, 09:40
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#7014
|
|
2011-06-21
, 09:42
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#7015
|
|
2011-06-21
, 09:44
|
Posts: 43 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ /dev/ttyS0
|
#7016
|
The Following User Says Thank You to morbid For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-21
, 09:44
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#7017
|
|
2011-06-21
, 09:45
|
Posts: 619 |
Thanked: 691 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#7018
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frappacino For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-21
, 09:45
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#7019
|
|
2011-06-21
, 09:51
|
Posts: 108 |
Thanked: 120 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#7020
|
I frankly don't see what you are getting it. I believe the N900 is the only other major smartphone without front facing buttons, but the N9 makes it a lot more powerful with the swipe gesture (as the N900 basically just forces applications to provide the button themselves, and you get stuck if they don't). Not having this button is cool, because it means more screen in the usable area of the phone. Of course you could cramp buttons in the small area below the screen, but that's not ergonomic in the least.
I believe that the swipe beats all current solutions in terms of ergonomics.
I said it could go on, not "on and on". There are things I don't know or can't think of which the N9 does better, and then there are smaller innovative details which you will learn to appreciate if you use the phone for a while (e.g. how to unlock the phone).
You know the back-story of the N9, it was meant to be Nokia's primary smartphone contender. You will have to forget about the N900 to truly appreciate it.
If it's not for you, then I'm sorry about that and you will have to move on. But I believe that most people will find the N9 a very enjoyable phone to use, and this time this includes all the demographics.
Tags |
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland |
Thread Tools | |
|