Active Topics
-
Camera phone competition March 2023 "Endless" (30)
to General by Wikiwide - 4 hrs, 43 mins ago -
Maemo repository (3)
to Community by torsen - 14 hrs, 8 mins ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (11)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 1 day, 11 hrs ago -
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (27)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smatkovi - 1 day, 16 hrs ago -
Introducing ubiboot N9 (multiboot OS loader) (1,393)
to Alternatives by smatkovi - 2 days, 18 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2010-04-04
, 20:47
|
|
Posts: 547 |
Thanked: 461 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ UK
|
#702
|
anyone flashed back to the stock kernel yet to see if info on settings>about comes back, id do it myself but am not at a pc.
| The Following User Says Thank You to biggzy For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-04
, 20:48
|
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#703
|
heh ntb have score 790,6ms
and 900Mhz nokia 25456,4
and 900Mhz nokia 25456,4
|
|
2010-04-04
, 20:51
|
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#704
|
Originally Posted by jakiman
Thanks, I have now flashed to 800mhz, had about 40% battery. Didn't realise it'd only take a second haha!
I think I did mine when my battery was 35% full. lol. As long as you know your battery isn't going to die on you during the 1second it takes to flash the kernel, you are fine. Battery full recommendation is to just be super duper safe. But if you are flashing via usb anyways, the USB cable is charging your phone anyways so no need for it to be full.
I'll see how it goes, might go too 900mhz soon.
 |
|
2010-04-04
, 20:51
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#705
|
yep, C2D at 3,6 Ghz with chrome has 396 ms, firefox 590 ms and ie8 almost 4000 ms 
 |
|
2010-04-04
, 20:52
|
|
Posts: 349 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ PS/IL
|
#706
|
Originally Posted by jessi3k3
26878.6ms +/- 6.7% @ 900mhz
If you guys want to benchmark the browser after you've overclocked, i'd suggest you run this benchmark in full screen
http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspide...sunspider.html
I know it's a webkit benchmark, but it should be a pretty good measure when comparing different clock speeds.
If you run the benchmark, make sure to note your score (should be the Total up top) and any overclocks you've done.
For me: 37233.6ms @ 600mhz (stock)
|
|
2010-04-04
, 20:53
|
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#707
|
900 Mhz-25484,0 ms. I did tap screen a few times during test.
|
|
2010-04-04
, 20:55
|
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#708
|
btw i have question
This test is highly influenced by the characteristics of the Internet connection, or am I wrong?
This test is highly influenced by the characteristics of the Internet connection, or am I wrong?
 |
|
2010-04-04
, 20:55
|
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 67 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Saint Louis, MO, USA
|
#709
|
Originally Posted by jessi3k3
24818.2 +/- 1.8% @ 900 MHz
If you guys want to benchmark the browser after you've overclocked, i'd suggest you run this benchmark in full screen
http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspide...sunspider.html
I know it's a webkit benchmark, but it should be a pretty good measure when comparing different clock speeds.
If you run the benchmark, make sure to note your score (should be the Total up top) and any overclocks you've done.
For me: 37233.6ms @ 600mhz (stock)
 |
|
2010-04-04
, 20:56
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#710
|
Originally Posted by biggzy
this is what i want to know
anyone flashed back to the stock kernel yet to see if info on settings>about comes back, id do it myself but am not at a pc.
__________________
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53.
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8