The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-23
, 23:17
|
Posts: 203 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#722
|
|
2010-02-23
, 23:28
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#723
|
Something is very wrong at that particular CARE center. The phones are supposed to be replaced...
|
2010-02-23
, 23:34
|
Posts: 53 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#724
|
I was told it was head office.
So what the hell should I do now.
How Many N900 users with this problem would be willing to sign a affidavit stating that they did nothing abnormal to the phone. A collection of these may be of value in small claims court along with the phone not having any scratches etc. Nokia's own claims that this is an issue on a small number of phones.
At that point it is down to Nokia to prove we have damaged the phones. And we demand repayment of the cost?
The Following User Says Thank You to nappleton For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-24
, 00:06
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#725
|
I'm starting to suspect that the real problem for Human Penguin is that his failure mode is different. Not excusing the service he's (not) getting, but I'm betting the directive for handling connector disengagement is very specific.
The Following User Says Thank You to HumanPenguin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-24
, 00:20
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#726
|
If the defect
becomes apparent within the first six months of purchase, it will be presumed to have existed
at the time of delivery, otherwise this will be for the consumer to prove.
This is when a consumer returns goods in the first six months from
the date of the sale. In that case, the consumer does not have to prove the goods were faulty
at the time of sale. It is assumed that they were. If the retailer does not agree, it is for him to
prove that the goods were satisfactory at the time of sale.
|
2010-02-24
, 00:32
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#727
|
This is greatly worrying i luckily don't have this problem yet!! YET but expect it will prob happen. As such i have been watching the thread for updates and i am appaled to see how nokia is handling it. I really really think more publicity is needed not really sure how to go abouts this but seriously surely Nokia can't get away with this they should just recall the phones :0(
|
2010-02-24
, 02:33
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#728
|
|
2010-02-24
, 03:25
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ anchorage, ak
|
#729
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to joa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-24
, 03:56
|
|
Posts: 579 |
Thanked: 286 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Australia
|
#730
|
Tags |
bad design, broken, charging, failure, hardware, loose, microusb, microusb port, n900, nokia, part, port, repair, return, surface mount, usb, usb port, warranty |
Thread Tools | |
|
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net