|
2010-10-21
, 11:20
|
|
Posts: 2,142 |
Thanked: 2,054 times |
Joined on Dec 2006
@ Sicily
|
#722
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to debernardis For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-21
, 12:11
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#723
|
|
2010-10-21
, 14:03
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#724
|
|
2010-10-21
, 14:16
|
Posts: 1,179 |
Thanked: 770 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#725
|
Here's something that I would like to see, that I think would be a funky UI 'enhancement.'
I would like the app launcher as a full-page 'widget'. This would eliminate the need to go to a different window to access apps. The user would just have to select the appropriate screen. Along the bottom of this app-selection desktop screen, there would be recently opened apps, which would double as a task manager.
On the bottom of the launcher window, there would be convenience buttons, much like there is now, but clicking the 'Home' would slide to the view screen containing the app selector, rather than popping open a new window.
The change is minimal, but I think it would look quite nice and be very intuitive. Additionally, it would allow for the modularization of the app selector as its just a widget -- many styles could be selected from -- and provide another point of manufacturer differentiation.
The Following User Says Thank You to etuoyo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-21
, 14:22
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#726
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-21
, 14:23
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#727
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-21
, 14:25
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#728
|
|
2010-10-21
, 14:32
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#729
|
Which brings me to something I have always wondered which is just how customizable is Android? With Maemo 5 everytime someone suggests something very useful a developer comes up with a way to implement it. So can't someone just implement what you have suggested in Android? Or do we have to rely on Google to implement that? If you have to rely on Google then doesn't that mean Android is not all that open?
|
2010-10-21
, 15:31
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#730
|
Tags |
android envy, buzz..buzz buzz, core failure, crapdroid, galaxy fap, galaxy tab, ipad killer, samsung, tab trolls, tablet envy |
Thread Tools | |
|
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR