Reply
Thread Tools
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#751
Is there a technical reason why 10.1 content cannot be made backward compatible to 9.x player? (Even on somewhat degraded presentation)

It completely degrades the the value of an "Adobe Flash compatible device" when there is a complete block for future contents when your device is not on the latest Flash version..

At the very least they gotta incorporate the flash version to the labeling, because the version turns out to be a very critical variable in this equation.
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post:
Posts: 10 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Finland
#752
Originally Posted by Frappacino View Post
dont bother waiting. Appreciate your n900 for what it is now or seek alternative avenues - hoping in vain is a waste of time.
Of course I try to appreciate N900 for what it is now but this is the first time (for me atleast) in the history of this phone that it is taking steps backwards.

As ysss said, it is supposed to be fully supported Adobe Flash device.
 
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#753
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
How many will have Froyo? Quite a few.

It's not out yet. And Flash Player 10.1 just came out June 17th.

But at least Android users - on some, not all phones - know if they are or are not getting an update for the most part.
Motorola is the only Android using company that I has said anything about Froyo, from my limited knowledge. And they said they will get it to the Droid but they don't know when.

I don't think HTC has made any announcement. Some HTC devices haven't even received 2.1 yet.

Sure, they'll end up with Froyo sometime but when? it is sad that some people come on here and are all, "woe is me. How could you betray me, Nokia? I'm jumping ship"

If you jump ship now, what other device will you jump to? As I type, only the Nexus One has Froyo. The EVO 4G doesn't, the Dell Streak doesn't.

At the moment, the n900 has the latest version of full Flash of any Nokia device and any other mobile device that isn't the Nexus One.

They wait for Froyo, we wait for Flash 10.1. Why move to another platform to wait again. Move when you are sure the n900 isn't getting Flash 10.1. Move when Froyo is on most Android phones
 
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#754
..and just to underline how big Adobe's erroneous plan/execution of this 'update' is, let's review those sites that stop working when they upgrade the server side components to 10.1:

- The actual content do not technically change (video codec, resolution, etc)
- The actual client/player are also still the same

Same media content, same playback device, blocked by Adobe in the middle.
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post:
Posts: 46 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Netherlands
#755
Personally I will find it rediculess if the N900 won't get flash 10.1.
It's an Internet tablet with one rather important advantage above all other smartphones which is it can browse the internet like a PC.

Just the thought that my friend with his Android smartphone can view more sites then I can with my internet tablet, makes me really sad.
 
mthmob's Avatar
Posts: 378 | Thanked: 206 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Denmark
#756
News added on adobe today regarding flash 10.1 for mobile devices..

MeeGo is meantioned.

http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pres...ilability.html
 
onethreealpha's Avatar
Posts: 434 | Thanked: 990 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Australia
#757
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
..and just to underline how big Adobe's erroneous plan/execution of this 'update' is, let's review those sites that stop working when they upgrade the server side components to 10.1:

- The actual content do not technically change (video codec, resolution, etc)
- The actual client/player are also still the same

Same media content, same playback device, blocked by Adobe in the middle.
100%!
and we p*ss and moan about Android and I-fashion being closed and trying to take over the world....
__________________
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to onethreealpha For This Useful Post:
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#758
Ah, time to bring up the crack analogy again.

Pass the pipe along, Nokia...

Adobe's got so many vendors in its pocket that we can't get our fix without our dealer picking up the latest street enhancement.
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ

***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful
 
Posts: 478 | Thanked: 101 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#759
Whats the point of having a phone like the n900 if you can't watch porn on it?

Has anyone pointed out this issue to Nokia?
 
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#760
Why did Android have to get it first?
 
Reply

Tags
adobe, adobe flash, blahblah, flash, flash 10, flash 10.1, fremantle, future, idiotic thread, maemo, maemo 5, nokia, nokia fails, update

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:23.